mirror of
https://github.com/headroomlabs-ai/headroom.git
synced 2026-08-27 14:17:10 -04:00
4 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
ac8646aa3c
|
fix(ci): scope the release credential and stop persisting it to disk (#3062)
## Description `RELEASE_PLEASE_TOKEN` is currently a maintainer's personal PAT. It bypasses branch and tag protection on `main` (`release-please.yml` says so in its own comment), and forging a tag with it fires `release.yml` and `docker.yml` on `release: published`, which publish to PyPI, npm and GHCR. If it is a classic token with `repo` scope it is also valid against every other repository that account can reach. `release-metadata-sync.yml` made that credential readable on the runner. `actions/checkout` defaults to `persist-credentials: true`, writing the token into `.git/config`, and the very next step runs `scripts/version-sync.py` **from the checked-out branch**. The trigger is a push to the glob `release-please--branches--**`, which is not a protected namespace, so a principal with push access could land a modified `version-sync.py` and read it. Closes #2955. ## Type of Change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Changes Made - Both release workflows now prefer a GitHub App installation token — scoped to this repository, expiring in an hour — over the PAT, via `actions/create-github-app-token@v3`. - The minting step is gated on `vars.RELEASE_APP_ID` and marked `continue-on-error`, so an unconfigured app falls through to the existing `PAT -> GITHUB_TOKEN` chain and nothing breaks today. - `release-metadata-sync.yml`'s checkout no longer persists credentials, and no longer receives a token at all. - The final push supplies the credential through the step's own `env` and an explicit remote URL, so it is never on disk while branch-supplied code runs. ## Testing - [x] Unit tests pass - [x] Linting passes (ruff check + format on the test file) - [ ] Type checking passes — N/A (YAML + test only) - [x] New tests added for new functionality ### Test Output ```text $ .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/test_release_workflows.py -q 1 failed, 44 passed, 1 skipped in 0.23s ``` The single failure is `test_no_native_tls_in_wheel_build_tree`, which shells out to `cargo`. It reproduces identically on unmodified `main` on this machine (no Rust toolchain installed) and is unrelated to this change. New tests only: ```text $ .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/test_release_workflows.py -q -k "persist_credentials or scoped_app_token" 3 passed, 46 deselected in 0.18s ``` Against the parent commit: ```text FAILED test_metadata_sync_does_not_persist_credentials_for_branch_supplied_code FAILED test_release_workflows_prefer_scoped_app_token[release-please.yml-release-please] FAILED test_release_workflows_prefer_scoped_app_token[release-metadata-sync.yml-sync] 3 failed, 46 deselected ``` ## Real Behavior Proof - Environment: macOS 15 (darwin 25.4.0), Python 3.12.13; workflows parsed with PyYAML, not executed on a runner. - Exact command / steps: parse both workflow files and assert (a) every `actions/checkout` step sets `persist-credentials: false` and receives no `token`, (b) exactly one gated `create-github-app-token` step exists per workflow, and (c) every credential consumer places `steps.app-token.outputs.token` ahead of `secrets.RELEASE_PLEASE_TOKEN` in its fallback chain. - Observed result: all three assertions pass on this branch and fail on the parent commit. Both files remain valid YAML. - **Not tested — important:** none of this has executed on a GitHub runner. I have not minted a real installation token, not confirmed the app-token step's `continue-on-error` fallback behaves as expected when `vars.RELEASE_APP_ID` is unset, and not performed a real push with the explicit-remote-URL form. The first live release run is the real test. ## Runtime Rollout Safety - Rollout-managed feature(s): none. - Minimum rollout channel: N/A. - Stable/default behavior changed: no, unless `vars.RELEASE_APP_ID` is set — without it both workflows resolve to exactly today's credential chain. - Kill switch / disable path: unset `vars.RELEASE_APP_ID` to fall back to the PAT. - Unsafe override required: none. - Qualification impact: none. - Rollback path: revert this commit. ## Review Readiness - [x] I have performed a self-review - [x] This PR is ready for human review ## Checklist - [x] My code follows the project's style guidelines - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes ## Additional Notes **This narrows blast radius; it does not make the trigger safe on its own.** For an `on: push` workflow GitHub reads the workflow file from the pushed ref, so a principal with push access can still edit this file on their branch. The durable fix is the scoped app token *plus revoking the personal PAT* — the revocation is a console action and is deliberately not in this commit. **Two repo settings are required to actually complete #2955**, and neither can land in git: ``` vars.RELEASE_APP_ID (repository variable) secrets.RELEASE_APP_PRIVATE_KEY (repository secret) ``` Until those exist this PR is a no-op on behavior and a defense-in-depth improvement on the `persist-credentials` path only. Co-authored-by: Tejas Chopra <tejas@Tejass-MacBook-Pro.local> |
||
|
|
807e5e3e6a
|
ci(release-please): use a PAT so releases trigger the publish workflows (#1920)
## Description
Makes the release pipeline hands-off by fixing the token release-please
uses.
### Why the current setup silently breaks publishing
release-please authenticates with `secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN`. **A
release/tag created by `GITHUB_TOKEN` does not emit events that trigger
other workflows** — this is GitHub's built-in recursion guard. So
`release.yml` (PyPI + npm) and `docker.yml`, which both fire on
`release: published`, **never ran off a bot-created release**. The
result: releases had to be cut by hand (`gh release create`, which runs
as a real user and *does* trigger them), and pip / npm / Docker drifted
out of sync (pip 0.30 vs Docker 0.27).
Proof: creating v0.31.0 manually (my user token) immediately kicked off
both `Release: v0.31.0` and `Docker: v0.31.0`; a `GITHUB_TOKEN`-created
release would not have.
### Change
Use `RELEASE_PLEASE_TOKEN` (a fine-grained PAT with `contents: write` +
`pull-requests: write`, treated by GitHub as a real user):
```yaml
token: ${{ secrets.RELEASE_PLEASE_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
```
- The release the bot creates now **does** trigger `release.yml` /
`docker.yml` → PyPI + npm + Docker publish automatically on merge of the
release PR.
- The PAT can also tag past branch/tag protection.
- Falls back to `GITHUB_TOKEN` if the secret is ever unset — the release
PR still opens; it just won't trigger downstream publishes (i.e. no
worse than today).
The `RELEASE_PLEASE_TOKEN` secret is already configured in repo
settings.
## Type of Change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature
- [ ] Breaking change
- [ ] Documentation update
- [ ] Performance improvement
- [ ] Code refactoring (no functional changes)
## Changes Made
- `.github/workflows/release-please.yml`: swap `token: ${{
secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}` for `${{ secrets.RELEASE_PLEASE_TOKEN ||
secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}`, with a comment explaining the recursion-guard
reason.
## Testing
- [x] Manual testing performed (YAML validated; token expression
resolves)
### Test Output
```text
$ python -c "import yaml; ... token: ${{ secrets.RELEASE_PLEASE_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}"
parse OK
```
## Real Behavior Proof
- Environment: local macOS; CI workflow YAML change only.
- Exact command / steps: changed the `token:` input on the
`release-please-action` step to the PAT (with GITHUB_TOKEN fallback);
validated the workflow YAML parses and the token expression is correct.
- Observed result: the workflow now authenticates release-please as a
real user via `RELEASE_PLEASE_TOKEN`, so releases it creates will emit
`release: published` and trigger `release.yml` + `docker.yml`. Verified
out-of-band that a user-token release does trigger those two workflows
(v0.31.0), whereas the bot token does not.
- Not tested: a full bot-driven release cycle end-to-end (only
observable when the next release PR merges with this token in place);
this PR is the enabling change for that.
## Review Readiness
- [x] I have performed a self-review
- [x] This PR is ready for human review
## Checklist
- [x] My code follows the project's style guidelines
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
|
||
|
|
53d2342291
|
ci: speed up GitHub Actions — path filters, caching, timeouts, version upgrades (#620)
* ci: speed up GitHub Actions - path filters, caching, timeouts, version upgrades
Performance improvements:
- init-e2e.yml, wrap-e2e.yml: add path filters so e2e Docker builds only run when
e2e-related files change (saves ~10 min per irrelevant PR push)
- init-e2e.yml, wrap-e2e.yml: add concurrency groups to cancel superseded PR runs
- ci.yml: add pip caching to lint and build jobs
- ci.yml: cache actionlint + act binaries in workflow-validation (skip curl on hits)
- eval.yml: add pip caching to smoke-test and weekly-suite jobs
- docs.yml: add pip caching for mkdocs-material install
- rust.yml: replace cargo install --locked cargo-audit/deny with taiki-e/install-action
(prebuilt binaries; saves 2-5 min per audit run)
Bug fixes:
- docker.yml: fix actions/checkout@v6 -> @v4 (v6 does not exist; would break all
Docker builds on every release/PR touching docker paths)
Version upgrades:
- wagoid/commitlint-github-action: @v5 -> @v6
- devcontainers.yml: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3 -> @v4 (align with docker.yml)
Safety improvements:
- ci.yml: add timeout-minutes to all 13 jobs (changes, lint, build-wheel,
prefetch-model, test x4, test-extras, test-agno, commitlint, build,
workflow-validation, docker-native-e2e, windows-native-wrapper, macos-native-wrapper)
- docker.yml: add timeout-minutes to docker-build (75m), docker-manifest (20m),
promote-latest (10m)
- eval.yml: add timeout-minutes to smoke-test (30m); bump weekly-suite 60->90m
- rust.yml: add timeout-minutes to test (30m), wheels (45m), audit (20m)
Observed wall-clock impact on recent PRs:
- Init E2E and Wrap E2E were running on every single PR push regardless of content
- CI workflow was taking 12-17 min; path filters reduce unnecessary e2e runs to 0
* fix(ci): bust actionlint+act cache when workflow file changes
Static cache key 'ci-tools-actionlint-act-v1' never invalidated on
tool version updates. Switched to hashFiles('.github/workflows/ci.yml')
so the cache busts automatically whenever the download scripts are
updated to point at a newer release.
Flagged by adversarial review (Architecture + Testing/Reliability personas).
* fix(ci): add missing Dockerfile COPY paths to e2e path filters
e2e/init/Dockerfile and e2e/wrap/Dockerfile COPY files not covered
by the initial path filter set:
init-e2e: Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock, rust-toolchain.toml, uv.lock,
.claude-plugin, .github/plugin/**, plugins/headroom-agent-hooks/**
wrap-e2e: Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock, rust-toolchain.toml, uv.lock,
sdk/typescript/**, plugins/openclaw/**
Without these, a Rust toolchain bump or SDK change on a PR would
skip the e2e gate entirely, only catching it on the merge to main.
Flagged by adversarial review (Domain/Correctness persona).
* fix(devcontainer): upgrade uv to >=0.7.0 to parse uv.lock revision=3
* fix(devcontainer): set UV_SKIP_WHEEL_FILENAME_CHECK=1 in post-create.sh for gitpython wheel
* ci: bump actions/checkout and actions/setup-node to v5 (Node.js 20 EOL Jun 16)
* fix(devcontainer): export UV_SKIP_WHEEL_FILENAME_CHECK so uv run also skips wheel check
* ci: bump all GitHub Actions to latest versions (Node.js 24)
* fix(test): accept release-please-action v4 or v5 in workflow assertion
* fix(format): ruff format test_release_workflows.py
|
||
|
|
c8e347f1ac |
ci(release): adopt release-please for gated publishes
Replace "every push to main = release" with release-please's release-PR pattern: the bot watches main and maintains a single "chore: release vX.Y.Z" PR aggregating conventional commits; merging that PR creates the tag + GitHub Release, which fires the release:published event that release.yml now triggers on. Why --- Per-merge releases burned PyPI's 10 GiB per-project storage quota (one fresh wheel matrix ~= 200 MB per merged fix/feat PR). publish-pypi has failed on every main merge since PR #482 with "400 Project size too large". Consolidating many fixes into one release cuts upload frequency ~5x. What changed ------------ - .github/workflows/release-please.yml: bot watching main - .release-please-config.json: python release-type + extra-files for sdk/typescript and plugins/openclaw package.json - .release-please-manifest.json: tracks current 0.9.1 - .github/workflows/release.yml: * trigger: push to main -> release: published * detect-version: reads tag from github.event.release.tag_name (strips leading "v") so release_version.py does not re-bump past the bot's tag * create-release: when release already exists (typical release-please path), do not pass --notes-file -- that would clobber the bot's auto-generated changelog body Tests ----- Five new regression tests in test_release_workflows.py prevent silent reversion to per-push triggering and assert the bot workflow + config invariants. Note ---- This commit does NOT fix the existing quota breach. Request a PyPI quota increase, yank old releases, or shrink the wheel matrix to free immediate space. This PR ensures the future release cadence stops growing the problem. |