ham-ref/chirp
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp synced 2026-08-13 17:51:36 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
chirp/tests/Python3_Driver_Testing.md

416 lines
40 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

Add some stats to the testing report So we can see how much is completed vs. remaining.
2022-10-23 23:00:13 -07:00
## Status
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| Driver | Tester | Tested | Byte Clean | "Market Share" |
| ------ | ------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="ARRL_Travel_Plus"></a> ARRL_Travel_Plus | | | | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Abbree_AR-518"></a> Abbree_AR-518 | | | | 0.24% |
| <a name="Abbree_AR-63"></a> Abbree_AR-63 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Python 3 support for Alinco DJ-G7 This PR introduces the following changes: - The base class of the Alinco driver is modified to hopefully work with Python 3; the str-based approach is kept. - The AlincoDJG7EG class is further modified to be byte-clean. This required a bunch of overries that can be moved to the base class once the other drivers become byte-clean. A possible strategy for this is documented in the PR thread on github. - The changes for the DJ-G7 were tested with a real radio; the code submitted passes all unit tests. - Modification of `py3_driver_testers.txt` and re-running `tox` for an updated .md file. - A small bug in the debug log is also fixed (payload was not printed).
2022-12-09 19:06:51 +01:00
| <a name="Alinco_DJ-G7EG"></a> Alinco_DJ-G7EG | [@HB9UF](https://github.com/HB9UF) | 09-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.44% |
Convert the rest of the alinco radios to py3 This uses the alinco simulator to make the determination that they are working, not real radios. But, confidence is pretty high.
2022-12-12 08:17:09 -08:00
| <a name="Alinco_DJ175"></a> Alinco_DJ175 | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Alinco_DJ596"></a> Alinco_DJ596 | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR03T"></a> Alinco_DR03T | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR06T"></a> Alinco_DR06T | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR135T"></a> Alinco_DR135T | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR235T"></a> Alinco_DR235T | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR435T"></a> Alinco_DR435T | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fix AnyTone 5888UV and friends for py3
2022-12-09 18:54:16 -08:00
| <a name="AnyTone_5888UV"></a> AnyTone_5888UV | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.14% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="AnyTone_5888UVIII"></a> AnyTone_5888UVIII | | | | 0.04% |
| <a name="AnyTone_778UV"></a> AnyTone_778UV | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.17% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="AnyTone_778UV_VOX"></a> AnyTone_778UV_VOX | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.23% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="AnyTone_OBLTR-8R"></a> AnyTone_OBLTR-8R | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="AnyTone_TERMN-8R"></a> AnyTone_TERMN-8R | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Anysecu_WP-9900"></a> Anysecu_WP-9900 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="BTECH_FRS-A1"></a> BTECH_FRS-A1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="BTECH_FRS-B1"></a> BTECH_FRS-B1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="BTECH_GMRS-20V2"></a> BTECH_GMRS-20V2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_GMRS-50X1"></a> BTECH_GMRS-50X1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.13% |
Update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-10 21:09:16 -05:00
| <a name="BTECH_GMRS-V1"></a> BTECH_GMRS-V1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.16% |
| <a name="BTECH_GMRS-V2"></a> BTECH_GMRS-V2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.16% |
| <a name="BTECH_MURS-V1"></a> BTECH_MURS-V1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-2501"></a> BTECH_UV-2501 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="BTECH_UV-2501+220"></a> BTECH_UV-2501+220 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="BTECH_UV-25X2"></a> BTECH_UV-25X2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.15% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-25X4"></a> BTECH_UV-25X4 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.11% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-5001"></a> BTECH_UV-5001 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="BTECH_UV-50X2"></a> BTECH_UV-50X2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.13% |
| <a name="BTECH_UV-50X2_G2"></a> BTECH_UV-50X2_G2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-10 21:09:16 -05:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-50X3"></a> BTECH_UV-50X3 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.06% |
Fixes and testing: uv5x3.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-09 19:06:32 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-5X3"></a> BTECH_UV-5X3 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.43% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-888"></a> Baofeng_BF-888 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 13-Feb-2019 | Yes | **15.53%** |
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-A58"></a> Baofeng_BF-A58 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | **1.46%** |
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-A58S"></a> Baofeng_BF-A58S | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.59% |
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-F8HP"></a> Baofeng_BF-F8HP | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | **6.33%** |
Update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-10 21:09:16 -05:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-T1"></a> Baofeng_BF-T1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.76% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-T8"></a> Baofeng_BF-T8 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.42% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-V8A"></a> Baofeng_BF-V8A | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Baofeng_F-11"></a> Baofeng_F-11 | [Implied by Baofeng_UV-5R](#user-content-Baofeng_UV-5R) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.12% |
| <a name="Baofeng_GT-3WP"></a> Baofeng_GT-3WP | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.43% |
| <a name="Baofeng_GT-5R"></a> Baofeng_GT-5R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.68% |
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-3R"></a> Baofeng_UV-3R | [@yarda](https://github.com/yarda) | 26-Sep-2022 | | 0.45% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-5R"></a> Baofeng_UV-5R | [@lekv](https://github.com/lekv) | 23-Oct-2022 | Yes | **28.81%** |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-6"></a> Baofeng_UV-6 | [Implied by Baofeng_UV-5R](#user-content-Baofeng_UV-5R) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.46% |
Update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-10 21:09:16 -05:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-6R"></a> Baofeng_UV-6R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.71% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-82"></a> Baofeng_UV-82 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | **8.78%** |
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-82HP"></a> Baofeng_UV-82HP | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | **2.38%** |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-82WP"></a> Baofeng_UV-82WP | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.32% |
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-9G"></a> Baofeng_UV-9G | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.65% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-9R"></a> Baofeng_UV-9R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | **2.52%** |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-B5"></a> Baofeng_UV-B5 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.35% |
Fixes and testing: LT-725UV & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-11 17:40:44 -05:00
| <a name="Baojie_BJ-218"></a> Baojie_BJ-218 | | | Yes | 0.29% |
| <a name="Baojie_BJ-318"></a> Baojie_BJ-318 | | | Yes | 0.10% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baojie_BJ-9900"></a> Baojie_BJ-9900 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Baojie_BJ-UV55"></a> Baojie_BJ-UV55 | | | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Boblov_X3Plus"></a> Boblov_X3Plus | | | | 0.02% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="CRT_Micron_UV"></a> CRT_Micron_UV | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
| <a name="CRT_Micron_UV_V2"></a> CRT_Micron_UV_V2 | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.10% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Commander_KG-UV"></a> Commander_KG-UV | | | | 0.00% |
| <a name="Explorer_QRZ-1"></a> Explorer_QRZ-1 | [Implied by TYT_TH-UV88](#user-content-TYT_TH-UV88) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-150A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-150A | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-160A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-160A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-268A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-268A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-268B"></a> Feidaxin_FD-268B | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-288A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-288A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-288B"></a> Feidaxin_FD-288B | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-450A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-450A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-460A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-460A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-460UH"></a> Feidaxin_FD-460UH | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Generic_CSV"></a> Generic_CSV | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 4-Dec-2022 | | |
Fix HobbyPCB RS-UV3 for python 3
2022-12-09 17:21:36 -08:00
| <a name="HobbyPCB_RS-UV3"></a> HobbyPCB_RS-UV3 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_746"></a> Icom_746 | | | Yes | 0.02% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-208H"></a> Icom_IC-208H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-2100H"></a> Icom_IC-2100H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-2200H"></a> Icom_IC-2200H | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-2300H"></a> Icom_IC-2300H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-2720H"></a> Icom_IC-2720H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-2730A"></a> Icom_IC-2730A | | | Yes | 0.21% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-2820H"></a> Icom_IC-2820H | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-7000"></a> Icom_IC-7000 | | | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-7100"></a> Icom_IC-7100 | | | Yes | 0.06% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-7200"></a> Icom_IC-7200 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | |
| <a name="Icom_IC-7300"></a> Icom_IC-7300 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-7610"></a> Icom_IC-7610 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-910"></a> Icom_IC-910 | [@mfncooper](https://github.com/mfncooper) | 1-Oct-2021 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-91_92AD"></a> Icom_IC-91_92AD | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 23-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-E90"></a> Icom_IC-E90 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-P7"></a> Icom_IC-P7 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-Q7A"></a> Icom_IC-Q7A | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 20-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-T70"></a> Icom_IC-T70 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-T7H"></a> Icom_IC-T7H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-T8A"></a> Icom_IC-T8A | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-V82_U82"></a> Icom_IC-V82_U82 | | | | 0.03% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-V86"></a> Icom_IC-V86 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-W32A"></a> Icom_IC-W32A | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-W32E"></a> Icom_IC-W32E | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-31A"></a> Icom_ID-31A | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 1-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Icom_ID-4100"></a> Icom_ID-4100 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 1-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Icom_ID-51"></a> Icom_ID-51 | [Implied by Icom_ID-31A](#user-content-Icom_ID-31A) | 1-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Icom_ID-5100"></a> Icom_ID-5100 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 1-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-51_Plus"></a> Icom_ID-51_Plus | [Implied by Icom_ID-31A](#user-content-Icom_ID-31A) | 1-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Icom_ID-51_Plus2"></a> Icom_ID-51_Plus2 | | | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Icom_ID-800H_v2"></a> Icom_ID-800H_v2 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-80H"></a> Icom_ID-80H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-880H"></a> Icom_ID-880H | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fix AnyTone 5888UV and friends for py3
2022-12-09 18:54:16 -08:00
| <a name="Intek_HR-2040"></a> Intek_HR-2040 | [Implied by AnyTone_5888UV](#user-content-AnyTone_5888UV) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Intek_KT-980HP"></a> Intek_KT-980HP | [Implied by Baofeng_BF-F8HP](#user-content-Baofeng_BF-F8HP) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Convert the rest of the alinco radios to py3 This uses the alinco simulator to make the determination that they are working, not real radios. But, confidence is pretty high.
2022-12-12 08:17:09 -08:00
| <a name="Jetstream_JT220M"></a> Jetstream_JT220M | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add Jetstream JT270MH and friends to py3 club
2022-12-13 12:56:45 -08:00
| <a name="Jetstream_JT270M"></a> Jetstream_JT270M | [Implied by Jetstream_JT270M](#user-content-Jetstream_JT270M) | 13-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Jetstream_JT270MH"></a> Jetstream_JT270MH | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 13-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="KYD_IP-620"></a> KYD_IP-620 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="KYD_NC-630A"></a> KYD_NC-630A | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_HMK"></a> Kenwood_HMK | [Implied by Generic_CSV](#user-content-Generic_CSV) | 4-Dec-2022 | | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_ITM"></a> Kenwood_ITM | | | | 0.00% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D7"></a> Kenwood_TH-D7 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D72_clone_mode"></a> Kenwood_TH-D72_clone_mode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D72_live_mode"></a> Kenwood_TH-D72_live_mode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 21-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D74_clone_mode"></a> Kenwood_TH-D74_clone_mode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D74_live_mode"></a> Kenwood_TH-D74_live_mode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 20-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D7G"></a> Kenwood_TH-D7G | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-F6"></a> Kenwood_TH-F6 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-F7"></a> Kenwood_TH-F7 | [@sv1](https://github.com/sv1) | 19-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-G71"></a> Kenwood_TH-G71 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-K2"></a> Kenwood_TH-K2 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-2180"></a> Kenwood_TK-2180 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-260"></a> Kenwood_TK-260 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-260G"></a> Kenwood_TK-260G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-270"></a> Kenwood_TK-270 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-270G"></a> Kenwood_TK-270G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-272"></a> Kenwood_TK-272 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-272G"></a> Kenwood_TK-272G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-278"></a> Kenwood_TK-278 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-278G"></a> Kenwood_TK-278G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-3180K"></a> Kenwood_TK-3180K | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-3180K2"></a> Kenwood_TK-3180K2 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-3180K](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-3180K) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-360"></a> Kenwood_TK-360 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-360G"></a> Kenwood_TK-360G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-370"></a> Kenwood_TK-370 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-370G"></a> Kenwood_TK-370G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-372"></a> Kenwood_TK-372 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-372G"></a> Kenwood_TK-372G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-378"></a> Kenwood_TK-378 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-378G"></a> Kenwood_TK-378G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-388G"></a> Kenwood_TK-388G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7102"></a> Kenwood_TK-7102 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7108"></a> Kenwood_TK-7108 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7180"></a> Kenwood_TK-7180 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 18-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7180E"></a> Kenwood_TK-7180E | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-7180](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-7180) | 18-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-760"></a> Kenwood_TK-760 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-760G"></a> Kenwood_TK-760G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-762"></a> Kenwood_TK-762 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-762G"></a> Kenwood_TK-762G | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-768"></a> Kenwood_TK-768 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-768G"></a> Kenwood_TK-768G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8102"></a> Kenwood_TK-8102 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8108"></a> Kenwood_TK-8108 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8180"></a> Kenwood_TK-8180 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 18-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8180E"></a> Kenwood_TK-8180E | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-8180](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-8180) | 18-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-860"></a> Kenwood_TK-860 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-860G"></a> Kenwood_TK-860G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-862"></a> Kenwood_TK-862 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-862G"></a> Kenwood_TK-862G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-868"></a> Kenwood_TK-868 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-868G"></a> Kenwood_TK-868G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-271"></a> Kenwood_TM-271 | [Implied by Kenwood_TM-281](#user-content-Kenwood_TM-281) | 23-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-281"></a> Kenwood_TM-281 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 23-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-471"></a> Kenwood_TM-471 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D700"></a> Kenwood_TM-D700 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 20-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D710"></a> Kenwood_TM-D710 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D710G"></a> Kenwood_TM-D710G | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D710G_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TM-D710G_CloneMode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D710_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TM-D710_CloneMode | | | Yes | 0.00% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-G707"></a> Kenwood_TM-G707 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-V7"></a> Kenwood_TM-V7 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-V71"></a> Kenwood_TM-V71 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 21-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-2000"></a> Kenwood_TS-2000 | | | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-480_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-480_CloneMode | | | | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-480_LiveMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-480_LiveMode | | | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-590SG_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-590SG_CloneMode | | | | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-590S_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-590S_CloneMode | | | | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-590S_SG_LiveMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-590S_SG_LiveMode | | | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-850"></a> Kenwood_TS-850 | | | Yes | 0.00% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="LUITON_LT-316"></a> LUITON_LT-316 | [Implied by Retevis_RT22](#user-content-Retevis_RT22) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="LUITON_LT-580_UHF"></a> LUITON_LT-580_UHF | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="LUITON_LT-580_VHF"></a> LUITON_LT-580_VHF | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="LUITON_LT-588UV"></a> LUITON_LT-588UV | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Fixes and testing: LT-725UV & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-11 17:40:44 -05:00
| <a name="LUITON_LT-725UV"></a> LUITON_LT-725UV | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Lanchonlh_HG-UV98"></a> Lanchonlh_HG-UV98 | | | Yes | 0.00% |
Add Jetstream JT270MH and friends to py3 club
2022-12-13 12:56:45 -08:00
| <a name="Leixen_VV-898"></a> Leixen_VV-898 | [Implied by Jetstream_JT270MH](#user-content-Jetstream_JT270MH) | 13-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.18% |
| <a name="Leixen_VV-898S"></a> Leixen_VV-898S | [Implied by Jetstream_JT270MH](#user-content-Jetstream_JT270MH) | 13-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.10% |
Fixes and testing: uv5x3.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-09 19:06:32 -08:00
| <a name="MTC_UV-5R-3"></a> MTC_UV-5R-3 | [Implied by BTECH_UV-5X3](#user-content-BTECH_UV-5X3) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Midland_DBR2500"></a> Midland_DBR2500 | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Fix AnyTone 5888UV and friends for py3
2022-12-09 18:54:16 -08:00
| <a name="Polmar_DB-50M"></a> Polmar_DB-50M | [Implied by AnyTone_5888UV](#user-content-AnyTone_5888UV) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Powerwerx_DB-750X"></a> Powerwerx_DB-750X | [Implied by AnyTone_5888UV](#user-content-AnyTone_5888UV) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Puxing_PX-2R"></a> Puxing_PX-2R | | | | 0.05% |
| <a name="Puxing_PX-777"></a> Puxing_PX-777 | | | | 0.11% |
| <a name="Puxing_PX-888K"></a> Puxing_PX-888K | | | | 0.07% |
| <a name="QYT_KT-8R"></a> QYT_KT-8R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.09% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="QYT_KT-UV980"></a> QYT_KT-UV980 | [Implied by WACCOM_MINI-8900](#user-content-WACCOM_MINI-8900) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="QYT_KT-WP12"></a> QYT_KT-WP12 | [Implied by Anysecu_WP-9900](#user-content-Anysecu_WP-9900) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="QYT_KT5800"></a> QYT_KT5800 | [Implied by BTECH_UV-25X2](#user-content-BTECH_UV-25X2) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="QYT_KT7900D"></a> QYT_KT7900D | [Implied by BTECH_UV-25X4](#user-content-BTECH_UV-25X4) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.37% |
| <a name="QYT_KT8900"></a> QYT_KT8900 | [Implied by LUITON_LT-588UV](#user-content-LUITON_LT-588UV) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.42% |
| <a name="QYT_KT8900D"></a> QYT_KT8900D | [Implied by BTECH_UV-25X2](#user-content-BTECH_UV-25X2) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.52% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="QYT_KT8900R"></a> QYT_KT8900R | [Implied by BTECH_UV-2501+220](#user-content-BTECH_UV-2501+220) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.13% |
| <a name="QYT_KT980PLUS"></a> QYT_KT980PLUS | [Implied by BTECH_UV-25X2](#user-content-BTECH_UV-25X2) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.09% |
| <a name="Quansheng_TG-UV2+"></a> Quansheng_TG-UV2+ | | | | 0.05% |
| <a name="RT_Systems_CSV"></a> RT_Systems_CSV | | | | |
| <a name="Radioddity_DB25-G"></a> Radioddity_DB25-G | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.17% |
| <a name="Radioddity_GA-2S"></a> Radioddity_GA-2S | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.19% |
| <a name="Radioddity_GA-510"></a> Radioddity_GA-510 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 21-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.42% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Radioddity_R2"></a> Radioddity_R2 | | | | 0.36% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Radioddity_UV-5G"></a> Radioddity_UV-5G | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.47% |
| <a name="Radioddity_UV-5RX3"></a> Radioddity_UV-5RX3 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.90% |
| <a name="Radioddity_UV-82X3"></a> Radioddity_UV-82X3 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
| <a name="Radtel_T18"></a> Radtel_T18 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.07% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_H777_Plus"></a> Retevis_H777_Plus | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.06% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RA685"></a> Retevis_RA685 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 19-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.25% |
| <a name="Retevis_RA85"></a> Retevis_RA85 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 19-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB15"></a> Retevis_RB15 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB17"></a> Retevis_RB17 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB17A"></a> Retevis_RB17A | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB17P"></a> Retevis_RB17P | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB17V"></a> Retevis_RB17V | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB18"></a> Retevis_RB18 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB19"></a> Retevis_RB19 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB19P"></a> Retevis_RB19P | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB23"></a> Retevis_RB23 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB26"></a> Retevis_RB26 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB27"></a> Retevis_RB27 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.09% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB27B"></a> Retevis_RB27B | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB27V"></a> Retevis_RB27V | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB615"></a> Retevis_RB615 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB617"></a> Retevis_RB617 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB618"></a> Retevis_RB618 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.16% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB619"></a> Retevis_RB619 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB627B"></a> Retevis_RB627B | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB75"></a> Retevis_RB75 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB85"></a> Retevis_RB85 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fixes and testing: Retevis RT1 & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-11 20:11:07 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT1"></a> Retevis_RT1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT16"></a> Retevis_RT16 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT19"></a> Retevis_RT19 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT21"></a> Retevis_RT21 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.20% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT22"></a> Retevis_RT22 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.53% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT22FRS"></a> Retevis_RT22FRS | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT22S"></a> Retevis_RT22S | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT23"></a> Retevis_RT23 | | | | 0.04% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT26"></a> Retevis_RT26 | | | | 0.03% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT29_UHF"></a> Retevis_RT29_UHF | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT29_VHF"></a> Retevis_RT29_VHF | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT40B"></a> Retevis_RT40B | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT47"></a> Retevis_RT47 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT47V"></a> Retevis_RT47V | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT6"></a> Retevis_RT6 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT619"></a> Retevis_RT619 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT622"></a> Retevis_RT622 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.09% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT647"></a> Retevis_RT647 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT668"></a> Retevis_RT668 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT68"></a> Retevis_RT68 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT76"></a> Retevis_RT76 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT76P"></a> Retevis_RT76P | | | | 0.04% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT85"></a> Retevis_RT85 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.22% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT87"></a> Retevis_RT87 | | | | 0.03% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT9000D_136-174"></a> Retevis_RT9000D_136-174 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT9000D_220-260"></a> Retevis_RT9000D_220-260 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT9000D_400-490"></a> Retevis_RT9000D_400-490 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT9000D_66-88"></a> Retevis_RT9000D_66-88 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT95"></a> Retevis_RT95 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT95_VOX"></a> Retevis_RT95_VOX | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.15% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt98.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-12 13:38:10 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT98"></a> Retevis_RT98 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 14-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Rugged_RH5R-V2"></a> Rugged_RH5R-V2 | | | | 0.05% |
| <a name="Sainsonic_AP510"></a> Sainsonic_AP510 | | | | 0.00% |
| <a name="TDXone_TD-Q8A"></a> TDXone_TD-Q8A | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="TIDRADIO_TD-H6"></a> TIDRADIO_TD-H6 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 21-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.43% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="TID_TD-M8"></a> TID_TD-M8 | [Implied by Retevis_RT22](#user-content-Retevis_RT22) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-350"></a> TYT_TH-350 | | | Yes | 0.07% |
| <a name="TYT_TH-7800"></a> TYT_TH-7800 | | | | 0.13% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-7800_File"></a> TYT_TH-7800_File | | | | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-9800"></a> TYT_TH-9800 | | | | 0.65% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-9800_File"></a> TYT_TH-9800_File | | | | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-UV3R"></a> TYT_TH-UV3R | | | | 0.04% |
| <a name="TYT_TH-UV3R-25"></a> TYT_TH-UV3R-25 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="TYT_TH-UV8000"></a> TYT_TH-UV8000 | | | | 0.31% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-UV88"></a> TYT_TH-UV88 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.51% |
Fix TYT TH-UV1F for py3
2022-12-13 13:18:14 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-UVF1"></a> TYT_TH-UVF1 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 13-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.06% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-UVF8D"></a> TYT_TH-UVF8D | | | | 0.05% |
| <a name="TYT_TH9000_144"></a> TYT_TH9000_144 | [Implied by Retevis_RT9000D_136-174](#user-content-Retevis_RT9000D_136-174) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.06% |
| <a name="TYT_TH9000_220"></a> TYT_TH9000_220 | [Implied by Retevis_RT9000D_220-260](#user-content-Retevis_RT9000D_220-260) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="TYT_TH9000_440"></a> TYT_TH9000_440 | [Implied by Retevis_RT9000D_400-490](#user-content-Retevis_RT9000D_400-490) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_FTL-1011"></a> Vertex_Standard_FTL-1011 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_FTL-2011"></a> Vertex_Standard_FTL-2011 | | | | 0.05% |
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_FTL-7011"></a> Vertex_Standard_FTL-7011 | | | | 0.03% |
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_FTL-8011"></a> Vertex_Standard_FTL-8011 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_VXA-700"></a> Vertex_Standard_VXA-700 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="WACCOM_MINI-8900"></a> WACCOM_MINI-8900 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.12% |
| <a name="WLN_KD-C1"></a> WLN_KD-C1 | [Implied by Retevis_RT22](#user-content-Retevis_RT22) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | **1.73%** |
Fixes and testing: wouxun.py, wouxun_common.py & update matrix
2022-12-11 14:44:24 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-816"></a> Wouxun_KG-816 | [Implied by Wouxun_KG-UV6](#user-content-Wouxun_KG-UV6) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.07% |
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-818"></a> Wouxun_KG-818 | [Implied by Wouxun_KG-UV6](#user-content-Wouxun_KG-UV6) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-935G"></a> Wouxun_KG-935G | | | | 0.05% |
Fixes and testing: wouxun.py, wouxun_common.py & update matrix
2022-12-11 14:44:24 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV6"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV6 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.19% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV8D"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV8D | | | | 0.24% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV8D_Plus"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV8D_Plus | | | | 0.08% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV8E"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV8E | | | | 0.05% |
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV920P-A"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV920P-A | | | | 0.04% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV9D_Plus"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV9D_Plus | | | | 0.39% |
Fixes and testing: wouxun.py, wouxun_common.py & update matrix
2022-12-11 14:44:24 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UVD1P"></a> Wouxun_KG-UVD1P | [Implied by Wouxun_KG-UV6](#user-content-Wouxun_KG-UV6) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.35% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-1500M"></a> Yaesu_FT-1500M | [@f3sty](https://github.com/f3sty) | 05-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-1802M"></a> Yaesu_FT-1802M | | | Yes | 0.02% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-1D_R"></a> Yaesu_FT-1D_R | | | Yes | 0.03% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-25R"></a> Yaesu_FT-25R | | | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-2800M"></a> Yaesu_FT-2800M | | | Yes | 0.03% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900R"></a> Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900R | | | Yes | 0.05% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900RTXMod_Opened_Xmit"></a> Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900RTXMod_Opened_Xmit | | | Yes | |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-450D"></a> Yaesu_FT-450D | | | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-4VR"></a> Yaesu_FT-4VR | | | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-4XE"></a> Yaesu_FT-4XE | | | Yes | 0.14% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-4XR"></a> Yaesu_FT-4XR | | | Yes | 0.11% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-50"></a> Yaesu_FT-50 | | | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-60"></a> Yaesu_FT-60 | | | Yes | 0.49% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-65E"></a> Yaesu_FT-65E | | | Yes | 0.08% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-65R"></a> Yaesu_FT-65R | | | Yes | 0.18% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-70D"></a> Yaesu_FT-70D | [@n8sqt](https://github.com/n8sqt) | 05-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.27% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-7100M"></a> Yaesu_FT-7100M | | | Yes | 0.03% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-7800_7900"></a> Yaesu_FT-7800_7900 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.14% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-8100"></a> Yaesu_FT-8100 | | | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-817"></a> Yaesu_FT-817 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.04% |
Mark 817_ND as implied like the other variants
2022-12-12 16:42:22 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-817ND"></a> Yaesu_FT-817ND | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.07% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-817ND_US"></a> Yaesu_FT-817ND_US | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-818"></a> Yaesu_FT-818 | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.05% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-818ND_US"></a> Yaesu_FT-818ND_US | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-857_897"></a> Yaesu_FT-857_897 | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.25% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-857_897_US"></a> Yaesu_FT-857_897_US | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.08% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-8800"></a> Yaesu_FT-8800 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-8900"></a> Yaesu_FT-8900 | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-8800](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-8800) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.11% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-90"></a> Yaesu_FT-90 | | | Yes | 0.02% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT2D_R"></a> Yaesu_FT2D_R | | | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT2D_Rv2"></a> Yaesu_FT2D_Rv2 | | | Yes | |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT3D_R"></a> Yaesu_FT3D_R | | | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FTM-3200D_R"></a> Yaesu_FTM-3200D_R | | | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FTM-350"></a> Yaesu_FTM-350 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FTM-7250D_R"></a> Yaesu_FTM-7250D_R | | | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-170"></a> Yaesu_VX-170 | | | Yes | 0.03% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-2"></a> Yaesu_VX-2 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/yaesu_clone.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-3"></a> Yaesu_VX-3 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.08% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-5"></a> Yaesu_VX-5 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/yaesu_clone.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.07% |
Update test matrix for Yaesu VX-6
2022-12-10 23:02:34 -05:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-6"></a> Yaesu_VX-6 | [@dominickpastore](https://github.com/dominickpastore) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.16% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-7"></a> Yaesu_VX-7 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.09% |
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-8DR"></a> Yaesu_VX-8DR | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-8GE"></a> Yaesu_VX-8GE | [Implied by Yaesu_VX-8DR](#user-content-Yaesu_VX-8DR) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-8R"></a> Yaesu_VX-8R | [Implied by Yaesu_VX-8DR](#user-content-Yaesu_VX-8DR) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Yedro_YC-M04VUS"></a> Yedro_YC-M04VUS | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="Zastone_ZT-X6"></a> Zastone_ZT-X6 | [Implied by Retevis_RT22](#user-content-Retevis_RT22) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.11% |
Add some stats to the testing report So we can see how much is completed vs. remaining.
2022-10-23 23:00:13 -07:00
## Stats
Update support matrix I didn't really test these directly, but I worked directly with the people that did.
2022-12-03 03:00:42 +00:00
**Drivers:** 355
Add some stats to the testing report So we can see how much is completed vs. remaining.
2022-10-23 23:00:13 -07:00
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt98.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-12 13:38:10 -05:00
**Tested:** 70% (250/105) (88% of usage stats)
Add some stats to the testing report So we can see how much is completed vs. remaining.
2022-10-23 23:00:13 -07:00
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt98.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-12 13:38:10 -05:00
**Byte clean:** 80% (285/70)
Add a test procedure to the bottom of the matrix For consistency and so a reader knows what "tested" means.
2022-12-04 10:51:06 -08:00
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
## Meaning of this testing
The goal here is not necessarily to test the drivers themselves in terms of
actual functionality, but rather to validate the Python 3 conversion
work required of nearly all drivers. Thus, we are not trying to
comprehensively test these models so much as make sure they work at least
as well as they do on the Python 2 branch. Uncovering and reporting new
bugs is definitely welcome, but for the purpoes of this effort, "no worse
than the legacy branch" is good enough. There are multiple levels of
confirmation in the matrix above:
* Tested with real hardware (i.e. a person listed in the "Tester" column)
using roughly the procedure below.
* An "implied by (model)" link means that another model was tested, and it
is so similar, that the model on that line can be considered tested as
well.
* A "probably works" link means that the driver has not been tested with
real hardware, nor is it substantially similar to another model, but
shares a common base that entirely provides the cloning routines with
other drivers that have been tested with real hardware, such that
confidence is high that it will work. Only drivers with test images in
the tree (or live drivers) should be marked with this class.
If you have a model listed in this matrix with either "implied" or
"probably works" status, an actual confirmation with real hardware is
welcome and can replace the weaker reference.
Add a test procedure to the bottom of the matrix For consistency and so a reader knows what "tested" means.
2022-12-04 10:51:06 -08:00
## Minimal test prodecure
For the purposes of the Python 3 effort, a "tested" radio means
at least the following procedure was followed:
1. Download from the radio
1. Make some change to a memory
1. If the radio has settings support, make sure settings load and tweak one setting
1. Upload to the radio
1. Confirm that the changes stick and look correct, or at least are not a
regression from the master py2 branch.
The drivers are all passing the automated tests, but tests with real hardware
and serial ports is important, especially around bytes-vs-string safety.
To update this document, add/edit entries in `tests/py3_driver_testers.txt` and
then run `tox -e makesupported`. Commit the result (including the changes to this `.md`
file) and submit a PR.
Add a note about "Byte Clean" to the matrix
2022-12-09 19:06:32 -08:00
The "Byte Clean" flag refers to whether or not the radio has set the
`NEEDS_COMPAT_SERIAL = False` flag on the radio class, and thus uses
`MemoryMapBytes` exclusively internally. Whenever possible, all radios
that are fixed for py3 should do so with this flag set to False and with
the byte-native memory map.
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink