mirror of
https://github.com/headroomlabs-ai/headroom.git
synced 2026-08-10 14:27:00 -04:00
## Description
`CostTracker.check_budget()` is a hard spend control — the Anthropic
handler refuses the request with a 429 once the period budget is gone.
The ledger that control reads could not tell a measured dollar from a
guessed one.
When a provider response carries no input-token breakdown,
`record_tokens()` substitutes Headroom's own `tokens_sent` estimate for
the input count so input cost isn't silently dropped from the budget.
That fallback is the right call, but the resulting record was
byte-identical to a provider-measured one: no field, no log line, no
separation in `/stats`. `RequestOutcome.uncached_input_tokens` defaults
to `0`, so any route whose response omits usage lands on this branch in
production. An estimate can drift in either direction, so a budget check
could pass after real spend had already gone over — with nothing saying
the decision rested on an estimate.
This keeps the fallback and makes it visible, then lets operators decide
what an estimate is allowed to do to a hard limit.
Closes #2713
## Type of Change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
## Changes Made
- New `headroom/proxy/budget_basis_policy.py` (pure policy module,
matching the existing `*_policy.py` convention): the
`measured`/`estimated` basis constants, the `count`/`ignore`/`block`
policy values, and `resolve_estimated_basis_policy()` (explicit value →
`HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS` → `count`; an unknown value warns once
and falls back rather than failing proxy startup).
- `headroom/proxy/cost.py`: ledger entries are now `CostEntry(timestamp,
cost_usd, basis)` instead of a bare tuple; `record_tokens()` marks the
fallback branch `estimated` and logs one WARNING per model (deduped the
same way pricing warnings are, per #2504 — an unguarded warning on this
path fires once per request for a provider that never reports usage);
new `period_cost_breakdown()` and an optional `basis` filter on
`get_period_cost()`; new `budget_denial_detail()` builds the 429 body
where the ledger lives; `check_budget()` honors the policy while keeping
its `(allowed, remaining)` signature.
- `stats()` gains `budget_estimated_basis` (the active policy) and
`budget_basis` (the period split: `total_usd`, `measured_usd`,
`estimated_usd`, `estimated_pct`, `records`, `estimated_records`).
`merge_cost_stats()` already spreads `**cost_stats`, so both reach
`/stats["cost"]` with no extra plumbing.
- Operator knob wired through every config layer:
`ProxyConfig.budget_estimated_basis` (`models.py`), the Click
`--budget-estimated-basis` option with `envvar=` (`cli/proxy.py`), the
argparse `--budget-estimated-basis` flag (`server.py`, `default=None` so
the env var stays reachable), and a `SettingField` in the `Budget` group
(`settings_store.py`).
- `headroom/proxy/handlers/anthropic.py`: the 429 body now comes from
`budget_denial_detail()`, which names how much of the period's spend was
booked from an estimate and distinguishes "you overspent" from "I refuse
to enforce a hard limit on a guess".
- `headroom/cli/doctor.py`: the budget check stays **PASS** and appends
the estimated share (and the policy, when it isn't the default). No new
WARN state — a provider that never reports usage would otherwise sit at
a permanent WARN. Every new read is `.get()` + type-guarded so `doctor`
still works against an older running proxy.
- `docs/content/docs/metrics.mdx`: a "Measured vs Estimated Spend"
subsection with the `/stats` shape and the three policy values.
- Tests: new `tests/test_cost_budget_basis.py` (20 tests) plus 4 new
`doctor` tests; `tests/test_anthropic_pre_upstream_backpressure.py`'s
cost-tracker double gained `budget_denial_detail()` to match the
handler's duck-typed contract.
### Policy values
| `HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS` | Effect on the hard limit |
|---|---|
| `count` (default) | Unchanged behavior — estimated spend consumes the
budget. |
| `ignore` | Booked and reported, but only measured spend enforces. |
| `block` | Fail closed — refuse rather than enforce a hard limit on a
guess. |
Default enforcement is unchanged. `CHANGELOG.md` is untouched.
## Testing
- [x] Unit tests pass (`pytest`) — every test covering the changed
modules; see `Not tested` for this machine's pre-existing environment
failures
- [x] Linting passes (`ruff check .`)
- [x] Type checking passes (`mypy headroom`) — clean on every file this
PR touches
- [x] New tests added for new functionality
- [x] Manual testing performed
### Test Output
```text
$ python -m pytest tests/test_cost_budget_basis.py tests/test_cost_tracker_counterfactual.py tests/test_cost_pricing_warning_dedup.py -q
31 passed
$ python -m pytest tests/test_cli_doctor.py -q
72 passed
$ python -m pytest tests/test_anthropic_pre_upstream_backpressure.py -q
25 passed
$ python -m pytest tests/test_proxy_settings_endpoints.py tests/test_proxy/test_settings_store.py -q
50 passed
# full suite (see "Not tested" below for the excluded modules and the pre-existing failures)
$ python -m pytest -q
...
tests\test_cost_budget_basis.py .................... [ 25%]
tests\test_cost_pricing_warning_dedup.py ... [ 25%]
tests\test_cost_tracker_counterfactual.py ........ [ 25%]
...
217 failed, 8807 passed, 657 skipped, 5318 warnings, 59 errors in 716.30s (0:11:56)
# same failing files re-run on clean upstream/main with the change stashed -> identical count
$ git stash push -u -- headroom tests docs
$ python -m pytest tests/test_log_compressor.py tests/test_cache/test_client_integration.py \
tests/test_fsutil.py tests/test_savings_ledger.py tests/test_ccr_mcp_http.py \
tests/test_router_registry_dispatch.py tests/test_proxy_savings_history.py \
tests/test_text_compressors.py tests/test_builtin_compressor_adapters.py \
tests/test_cli_proxy_env.py -q
73 failed, 182 passed in 34.82s # 40+16+2+2+1+1+1+4+3+3 = 73, matching the run above
$ python -m mypy headroom --ignore-missing-imports --python-version 3.13
# 12 errors, all in release_version.py / ccr/mcp_server.py / memory/mcp_server.py
# (stale local `mcp` stubs) — none in any file this PR touches
$ python -m ruff check headroom/proxy/budget_basis_policy.py headroom/proxy/cost.py headroom/proxy/server.py headroom/proxy/models.py headroom/proxy/handlers/anthropic.py headroom/cli/proxy.py headroom/cli/doctor.py headroom/settings_store.py tests/test_cost_budget_basis.py tests/test_cli_doctor.py tests/test_anthropic_pre_upstream_backpressure.py
All checks passed!
$ python -m ruff format --check <same 11 files>
11 files already formatted
```
## Real Behavior Proof
- Environment: Windows 11, Python 3.13.11, branch
`fix/budget-estimated-basis-2713` off `upstream/main` @ `232fb49c`,
`PYTHONPATH` pointed at the working tree so the repo copy of `headroom`
is imported rather than the installed one.
- Exact command / steps: ran the repro script from the issue body
verbatim, then extended it to print `stats()["budget_basis"]` for both
trackers, to construct the same tracker with
`estimated_basis_policy="block"` and with `"ignore"`, and to record
twice against the same model to check the warning dedup. Separately
drove `headroom doctor`'s `check_budget` against stub `/stats` payloads
(mixed basis, all-measured, non-default policy, and an older proxy that
omits the new keys).
- Observed result: the issue's two figures are unchanged, so the
fallback still works — no breakdown `$0.008100`, with breakdown
`$0.005100`, ratio `1.59x`. The two are now separable: the no-breakdown
tracker reports `{'total_usd': 0.0081, 'measured_usd': 0.0,
'estimated_usd': 0.0081, 'estimated_pct': 100.0, 'records': 1,
'estimated_records': 1}` and the with-breakdown tracker reports
`estimated_usd: 0.0, estimated_pct: 0.0, estimated_records: 0`. One
`WARNING headroom.proxy: budget basis estimated: no usage breakdown from
provider for gpt-4o-mini — input cost booked from Headroom's own token
count` fires across repeated records, not one per request. With
`policy=block`, `check_budget()` returns `(False, 0.0)` and the 429
detail reads `Budget enforcement blocked for daily period: $0.0081 of
$0.0081 was booked from Headroom's own token estimate because the
provider returned no usage breakdown, and
HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS=block refuses to enforce a budget on an
estimate. Set it to 'count' or 'ignore' to serve these requests.` With
`policy=ignore`, `check_budget()` returns `(True, 0.0001)` while the
spend is still booked and reported (`0.7506`). `doctor` prints `pass
$10.0/daily budget enforced — 62% of period spend ($1.2400) booked from
Headroom token estimates`, appends `— estimated-basis policy: block` for
a non-default policy, and degrades to the plain `$10.0/daily budget
enforced` against a proxy that doesn't report the new fields.
`--budget-estimated-basis [count|ignore|block]` shows in `headroom proxy
--help`; the argparse path resolves the env var when the flag is absent
and an explicit flag wins over the env.
- Not tested: no live end-to-end run against a real provider that omits
usage in its response — the estimated basis was exercised through
`record_tokens()` directly, which is the single funnel
`emit_request_outcome()` uses. The `settings_store` field was not
exercised through the settings UI. The full-suite run above excludes
three things this machine cannot run, none of which touch the changed
files: `tests/test_hermes_passthrough_compression.py` (`respx` not
installed), `tests/test_memory/test_embedder_mps_serialization.py`
(`sentence_transformers` pins `tokenizers<=0.23.0`, local has `0.23.1`),
and `tests/test_cli/` (its subprocess-spawning tests wedge against a
leftover local proxy on :8787; each file passes in isolation, e.g.
`test_wrap_bridge.py` 7/7). Its 217 failures are all pre-existing
environment breakage — a stale local Rust `_core` build
(`test_log_compressor.py`, `test_text_compressors.py`,
`test_builtin_compressor_adapters.py`, `test_cli_proxy_env.py`, the
`test_transforms*` files) and the broken `sentence_transformers` install
(`tests/test_memory/*`, `test_memory_system.py`,
`test_sqlite_graph_store.py`) — with zero overlap with the modules this
PR changes; the stashed baseline above reproduces them 1:1. CI is the
authority for a green full suite.
## Review Readiness
- [x] I have performed a self-review
- [x] This PR is ready for human review
## Checklist
- [x] My code follows the project's style guidelines
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes — the
only local failures are pre-existing and reproduce with the change
stashed
- [x] I did **not** edit `CHANGELOG.md` — it is generated by
release-please from my Conventional Commit PR title (a CI guard enforces
this)
## Additional Notes
The estimated-basis WARNING is deduped per model rather than emitted per
request, following the precedent set by #2504 for pricing warnings — the
whole point of this code path is that it fires on every request for a
provider that never reports usage, so an unguarded `logger.warning`
would flood `proxy.log`.
`headroom doctor` deliberately stays PASS. A WARN would be permanent,
not actionable, for anyone whose provider simply doesn't report usage;
the note tells them the number, and the `block` policy is there for
operators who want the hard failure.
`check_budget()` keeps its `(allowed, remaining)` signature and its
default `count` semantics, so
`tests/test_cost_tracker_counterfactual.py` — including
`test_budget_input_cost_counted_without_usage_breakdown`, the contract
that the fallback keeps working — passes unmodified.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3eb0122068
commit
01df245252
12 changed files with 736 additions and 17 deletions
|
|
@ -252,6 +252,44 @@ headroom proxy --budget 10.00
|
|||
|
||||
When the budget is exceeded, requests return a budget exceeded error, the `/stats` endpoint shows budget status, and logs indicate the budget state.
|
||||
|
||||
### Measured vs Estimated Spend
|
||||
|
||||
Every cost record carries a *basis* — where its input-token count came from. When a provider response includes a usage breakdown, the basis is `measured`. When it doesn't, Headroom substitutes its own `tokens_sent` count so input cost isn't dropped from the budget, and the record's basis is `estimated`. Headroom logs one warning per model the first time this happens.
|
||||
|
||||
`/stats` keeps the two separable under `cost.budget_basis`:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cost": {
|
||||
"budget_limit_usd": 10.0,
|
||||
"budget_period": "daily",
|
||||
"budget_estimated_basis": "count",
|
||||
"budget_basis": {
|
||||
"total_usd": 3.1400,
|
||||
"measured_usd": 2.9000,
|
||||
"estimated_usd": 0.2400,
|
||||
"estimated_pct": 7.6,
|
||||
"records": 412,
|
||||
"estimated_records": 31
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
An estimate can drift in either direction, so you choose what it does to the hard limit:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
headroom proxy --budget 10.00 --budget-estimated-basis count # default
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
| Value | Effect |
|
||||
|-------|--------|
|
||||
| `count` | Estimated spend consumes the budget like measured spend. The default; matches historical behavior. |
|
||||
| `ignore` | Estimated spend is still booked and reported, but only provider-reported spend consumes the budget. |
|
||||
| `block` | Refuse requests once the period holds any estimated spend, rather than enforcing a hard limit against a guess. |
|
||||
|
||||
Env: `HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS`. `headroom doctor` reports the estimated share alongside the budget check.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Metrics to Monitor
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | What It Tells You | Target |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -426,7 +426,36 @@ def check_budget(stats: dict[str, Any] | None) -> CheckResult:
|
|||
hint="set one: headroom proxy --budget 10 (env: HEADROOM_BUDGET)",
|
||||
)
|
||||
period = cost.get("budget_period", "daily")
|
||||
return CheckResult(name=name, status=PASS, summary=f"${limit}/{period} budget enforced")
|
||||
summary = f"${limit}/{period} budget enforced"
|
||||
return CheckResult(name=name, status=PASS, summary=summary + _estimated_basis_note(cost))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _estimated_basis_note(cost: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
|
||||
"""Describe how much of the period's spend was booked from a token estimate.
|
||||
|
||||
Informational, never a WARN: a provider that simply never reports a usage
|
||||
breakdown would otherwise sit at a permanent warning. Every read is
|
||||
defensive so `doctor` still works against a proxy predating these fields.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
note = ""
|
||||
|
||||
basis = cost.get("budget_basis")
|
||||
if isinstance(basis, dict):
|
||||
estimated_usd = basis.get("estimated_usd")
|
||||
estimated_pct = basis.get("estimated_pct")
|
||||
if isinstance(estimated_usd, (int, float)) and estimated_usd > 0:
|
||||
pct = f"{estimated_pct:.0f}% " if isinstance(estimated_pct, (int, float)) else ""
|
||||
note += (
|
||||
f" — {pct}of period spend (${estimated_usd:.4f}) "
|
||||
"booked from Headroom token estimates"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Reported independently of the breakdown: a non-default policy changes how
|
||||
# the budget is enforced and should surface even if the split is missing.
|
||||
policy = cost.get("budget_estimated_basis")
|
||||
if isinstance(policy, str) and policy and policy != "count":
|
||||
note += f" — estimated-basis policy: {policy}"
|
||||
return note
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def check_deployments(manifests: list[Any], probe: Any = probe_json) -> CheckResult | None:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -534,6 +534,20 @@ def dashboard(port: int, no_open: bool) -> None:
|
|||
"Env: HEADROOM_BUDGET_PERIOD."
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
@click.option(
|
||||
"--budget-estimated-basis",
|
||||
type=click.Choice(["count", "ignore", "block"]),
|
||||
default="count",
|
||||
envvar="HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS",
|
||||
help=(
|
||||
"What to do with spend booked from Headroom's own token estimate, which "
|
||||
"happens when a provider response carries no input-token breakdown. "
|
||||
"count: it consumes the budget like measured spend (default). "
|
||||
"ignore: only provider-reported spend consumes the budget. "
|
||||
"block: refuse requests rather than enforce a hard limit on an estimate. "
|
||||
"Env: HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS."
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Code-aware compression (AST-based, requires `pip install headroom-ai[code]`).
|
||||
# Pair of flags so users can override the env-var default in either direction.
|
||||
# We resolve HEADROOM_CODE_AWARE_ENABLED in the body (not via Click's envvar=),
|
||||
|
|
@ -941,6 +955,7 @@ def proxy(
|
|||
codex_wire_debug_dir: str | None,
|
||||
budget: float | None,
|
||||
budget_period: str,
|
||||
budget_estimated_basis: str,
|
||||
code_aware_flag: bool | None,
|
||||
disable_kompress: bool,
|
||||
disable_kompress_fallback: bool,
|
||||
|
|
@ -1235,6 +1250,7 @@ def proxy(
|
|||
or os.environ.get("HEADROOM_LOG_MESSAGES", "").lower() in ("true", "1", "yes", "on"),
|
||||
budget_limit_usd=budget,
|
||||
budget_period=cast(Literal["hourly", "daily", "monthly"], budget_period),
|
||||
budget_estimated_basis=cast(Literal["count", "ignore", "block"], budget_estimated_basis),
|
||||
# Code-aware compression resolution:
|
||||
# 1. Explicit --code-aware / --no-code-aware always wins.
|
||||
# 2. Otherwise read HEADROOM_CODE_AWARE_ENABLED (truthy = on).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
81
headroom/proxy/budget_basis_policy.py
Normal file
81
headroom/proxy/budget_basis_policy.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
|
|||
"""Policy for how estimate-based cost records feed budget enforcement.
|
||||
|
||||
Every cost record the proxy books carries a *basis*: where the input-token
|
||||
count came from. ``measured`` means the provider reported a usage breakdown;
|
||||
``estimated`` means the response carried none and Headroom substituted its own
|
||||
``tokens_sent`` count so input cost wasn't silently dropped from the budget
|
||||
(#2713).
|
||||
|
||||
The substitution is the right default — dropping input cost entirely would
|
||||
under-enforce far worse — but a budget is a hard control, and an estimate can
|
||||
drift in either direction. This module names the two bases and the three
|
||||
policies an operator can pick for what estimated spend does to the budget:
|
||||
|
||||
* ``count`` — estimated spend counts toward the limit (the historical
|
||||
behavior, and still the default; nothing changes except that the record is
|
||||
now marked, logged, and separable in ``/stats``).
|
||||
* ``ignore`` — the record is still booked to the ledger and reported, but only
|
||||
provider-measured spend consumes the budget. Fails open on the estimate.
|
||||
* ``block`` — fail closed: once the period holds any estimated spend, refuse
|
||||
rather than enforce a hard limit against a guess.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
from collections.abc import Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
logger = logging.getLogger("headroom.proxy")
|
||||
|
||||
# Provenance of the input-token count behind a booked cost record.
|
||||
COST_BASIS_MEASURED = "measured"
|
||||
COST_BASIS_ESTIMATED = "estimated"
|
||||
|
||||
# What estimated spend does to budget enforcement.
|
||||
BUDGET_BASIS_COUNT = "count"
|
||||
BUDGET_BASIS_IGNORE = "ignore"
|
||||
BUDGET_BASIS_BLOCK = "block"
|
||||
|
||||
VALID_POLICIES = (BUDGET_BASIS_COUNT, BUDGET_BASIS_IGNORE, BUDGET_BASIS_BLOCK)
|
||||
DEFAULT_POLICY = BUDGET_BASIS_COUNT
|
||||
|
||||
ENV_VAR = "HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS"
|
||||
|
||||
# A typo'd knob must not fail proxy startup, but it also must not warn on every
|
||||
# resolve. Bounded by the number of distinct bad values seen (realistically 1).
|
||||
_warned_invalid_policies: set[str] = set()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def resolve_estimated_basis_policy(
|
||||
configured: str | None = None,
|
||||
env: Mapping[str, str] | None = None,
|
||||
) -> str:
|
||||
"""Resolve the estimated-basis budget policy.
|
||||
|
||||
Precedence: explicit ``configured`` value, then ``env[ENV_VAR]``, then
|
||||
:data:`DEFAULT_POLICY`. An unrecognized value falls back to the default and
|
||||
warns once — a misconfigured knob should never stop the proxy from booting,
|
||||
but it must not silently change enforcement either.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
raw = configured
|
||||
if raw is None and env is not None:
|
||||
raw = env.get(ENV_VAR)
|
||||
if raw is None:
|
||||
return DEFAULT_POLICY
|
||||
|
||||
candidate = raw.strip().lower()
|
||||
if candidate in VALID_POLICIES:
|
||||
return candidate
|
||||
if not candidate:
|
||||
return DEFAULT_POLICY
|
||||
|
||||
if candidate not in _warned_invalid_policies:
|
||||
_warned_invalid_policies.add(candidate)
|
||||
logger.warning(
|
||||
"Unknown %s=%r — falling back to %r (valid: %s)",
|
||||
ENV_VAR,
|
||||
raw,
|
||||
DEFAULT_POLICY,
|
||||
", ".join(VALID_POLICIES),
|
||||
)
|
||||
return DEFAULT_POLICY
|
||||
|
|
@ -13,8 +13,17 @@ import logging
|
|||
import math
|
||||
from collections import deque
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
|
||||
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any
|
||||
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, NamedTuple
|
||||
|
||||
from headroom.proxy.budget_basis_policy import (
|
||||
BUDGET_BASIS_BLOCK,
|
||||
BUDGET_BASIS_IGNORE,
|
||||
COST_BASIS_ESTIMATED,
|
||||
COST_BASIS_MEASURED,
|
||||
DEFAULT_POLICY,
|
||||
ENV_VAR,
|
||||
resolve_estimated_basis_policy,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from headroom.proxy.modes import PROXY_MODE_CACHE
|
||||
|
||||
if TYPE_CHECKING:
|
||||
|
|
@ -60,6 +69,40 @@ def _warn_pricing_once(model: str, message: str) -> None:
|
|||
logger.warning(message)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# A route whose responses never carry a usage breakdown hits the estimated-basis
|
||||
# fallback on *every* request, so the warning is deduped per model for the same
|
||||
# reason pricing warnings are (#2504): one line per model per process, not one
|
||||
# per request. The distinction stays permanently visible in /stats regardless.
|
||||
_warned_estimated_basis_models: set[str] = set()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _warn_estimated_basis_once(model: str) -> None:
|
||||
"""Warn the first time ``model`` books a cost against Headroom's estimate."""
|
||||
if model in _warned_estimated_basis_models:
|
||||
return
|
||||
_warned_estimated_basis_models.add(model)
|
||||
logger.warning(
|
||||
"budget basis estimated: no usage breakdown from provider for %s — "
|
||||
"input cost booked from Headroom's own token count",
|
||||
model,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class CostEntry(NamedTuple):
|
||||
"""One booked cost, with the provenance of the input count behind it.
|
||||
|
||||
``basis`` is :data:`~headroom.proxy.budget_basis_policy.COST_BASIS_MEASURED`
|
||||
when the provider reported a usage breakdown, and ``COST_BASIS_ESTIMATED``
|
||||
when it didn't and Headroom's own ``tokens_sent`` stood in for the input
|
||||
count. Budget enforcement is a hard control, so the two must stay separable
|
||||
in the ledger rather than collapsing into an undifferentiated dollar figure.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
timestamp: datetime
|
||||
cost_usd: float
|
||||
basis: str
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Provider-specific cache discount multipliers (what fraction of input price)
|
||||
# Used to calculate dollar savings from prefix caching
|
||||
_CACHE_ECONOMICS = {
|
||||
|
|
@ -644,12 +687,21 @@ class CostTracker:
|
|||
# get_period_cost() undercounts and check_budget() silently under-enforces.
|
||||
COST_RETENTION_HOURS = 744 # 31 days
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, budget_limit_usd: float | None = None, budget_period: str = "daily"):
|
||||
def __init__(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
budget_limit_usd: float | None = None,
|
||||
budget_period: str = "daily",
|
||||
estimated_basis_policy: str = DEFAULT_POLICY,
|
||||
):
|
||||
self.budget_limit_usd = budget_limit_usd
|
||||
self.budget_period = budget_period
|
||||
# What estimated-basis spend does to enforcement. Normalized here so a
|
||||
# bad value degrades to the default instead of quietly disabling the
|
||||
# budget. See headroom.proxy.budget_basis_policy.
|
||||
self.estimated_basis_policy = resolve_estimated_basis_policy(estimated_basis_policy)
|
||||
|
||||
# Cost tracking - using deque for efficient left-side removal
|
||||
self._costs: deque[tuple[datetime, float]] = deque(maxlen=self.MAX_COST_ENTRIES)
|
||||
self._costs: deque[CostEntry] = deque(maxlen=self.MAX_COST_ENTRIES)
|
||||
self._last_prune_time: datetime = datetime.now()
|
||||
|
||||
# Token savings per model (exact, no dollar estimation)
|
||||
|
|
@ -743,7 +795,7 @@ class CostTracker:
|
|||
cutoff = now - timedelta(hours=self.COST_RETENTION_HOURS)
|
||||
|
||||
# Remove entries from the left (oldest) while they're older than cutoff
|
||||
while self._costs and self._costs[0][0] < cutoff:
|
||||
while self._costs and self._costs[0].timestamp < cutoff:
|
||||
self._costs.popleft()
|
||||
|
||||
def record_tokens(
|
||||
|
|
@ -807,9 +859,17 @@ class CostTracker:
|
|||
# When the call site had no API usage breakdown (all cache/uncached
|
||||
# fields are 0), fall back to tokens_sent so input cost isn't
|
||||
# silently dropped from the budget.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# That fallback is a guess, and check_budget() is a hard control, so the
|
||||
# record is stamped ``estimated`` and warned about once per model (#2713).
|
||||
# The fallback behaviour itself is unchanged — the estimate is now
|
||||
# labelled rather than indistinguishable from provider-reported usage.
|
||||
basis = COST_BASIS_MEASURED
|
||||
input_tokens = uncached_tokens
|
||||
if not (uncached_tokens or cache_read_tokens or cache_write_tokens):
|
||||
input_tokens = tokens_sent
|
||||
basis = COST_BASIS_ESTIMATED
|
||||
_warn_estimated_basis_once(model)
|
||||
cost = self.estimate_cost(
|
||||
model=model,
|
||||
input_tokens=input_tokens,
|
||||
|
|
@ -818,31 +878,121 @@ class CostTracker:
|
|||
cache_write_tokens=cache_write_tokens,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if cost is not None:
|
||||
self._costs.append((datetime.now(), cost))
|
||||
self._costs.append(CostEntry(datetime.now(), cost, basis))
|
||||
self._prune_old_costs()
|
||||
|
||||
def get_period_cost(self) -> float:
|
||||
"""Get cost for current budget period."""
|
||||
def _period_cutoff(self) -> datetime:
|
||||
"""Start of the current budget period."""
|
||||
now = datetime.now()
|
||||
|
||||
if self.budget_period == "hourly":
|
||||
cutoff = now - timedelta(hours=1)
|
||||
elif self.budget_period == "daily":
|
||||
cutoff = now.replace(hour=0, minute=0, second=0, microsecond=0)
|
||||
else: # monthly
|
||||
cutoff = now.replace(day=1, hour=0, minute=0, second=0, microsecond=0)
|
||||
return now - timedelta(hours=1)
|
||||
if self.budget_period == "daily":
|
||||
return now.replace(hour=0, minute=0, second=0, microsecond=0)
|
||||
# monthly
|
||||
return now.replace(day=1, hour=0, minute=0, second=0, microsecond=0)
|
||||
|
||||
return sum(cost for ts, cost in self._costs if ts >= cutoff)
|
||||
def get_period_cost(self, basis: str | None = None) -> float:
|
||||
"""Get cost for current budget period.
|
||||
|
||||
With no argument this is the total spend booked in the period,
|
||||
regardless of how each record's input count was derived. Pass a basis
|
||||
(``"measured"`` / ``"estimated"``) to get just that slice.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
cutoff = self._period_cutoff()
|
||||
return sum(
|
||||
entry.cost_usd
|
||||
for entry in self._costs
|
||||
if entry.timestamp >= cutoff and (basis is None or entry.basis == basis)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def period_cost_breakdown(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Split the period's booked spend by how its input count was derived.
|
||||
|
||||
``estimated_usd`` is spend whose input token count came from Headroom's
|
||||
own estimate because the provider returned no usage breakdown. Keeping
|
||||
it separable is the point: a budget refusal driven by a guess should be
|
||||
distinguishable from one driven by provider-reported usage (#2713).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
cutoff = self._period_cutoff()
|
||||
measured_usd = 0.0
|
||||
estimated_usd = 0.0
|
||||
records = 0
|
||||
estimated_records = 0
|
||||
for entry in self._costs:
|
||||
if entry.timestamp < cutoff:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
records += 1
|
||||
if entry.basis == COST_BASIS_ESTIMATED:
|
||||
estimated_usd += entry.cost_usd
|
||||
estimated_records += 1
|
||||
else:
|
||||
measured_usd += entry.cost_usd
|
||||
|
||||
total_usd = measured_usd + estimated_usd
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"period": self.budget_period,
|
||||
"policy": self.estimated_basis_policy,
|
||||
"total_usd": total_usd,
|
||||
"measured_usd": measured_usd,
|
||||
"estimated_usd": estimated_usd,
|
||||
"estimated_pct": round(estimated_usd / total_usd * 100, 1) if total_usd > 0 else 0.0,
|
||||
"records": records,
|
||||
"estimated_records": estimated_records,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def check_budget(self) -> tuple[bool, float]:
|
||||
"""Check if within budget. Returns (allowed, remaining)."""
|
||||
"""Check if within budget. Returns (allowed, remaining).
|
||||
|
||||
How estimated-basis spend participates is governed by
|
||||
``estimated_basis_policy``: ``count`` (default) enforces against total
|
||||
spend exactly as before, ``ignore`` enforces against provider-measured
|
||||
spend only, and ``block`` refuses outright once the period holds any
|
||||
estimated spend rather than enforcing a hard limit against a guess.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if self.budget_limit_usd is None:
|
||||
return True, float("inf")
|
||||
|
||||
period_cost = self.get_period_cost()
|
||||
breakdown = self.period_cost_breakdown()
|
||||
|
||||
if self.estimated_basis_policy == BUDGET_BASIS_BLOCK and breakdown["estimated_usd"] > 0:
|
||||
return False, 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
if self.estimated_basis_policy == BUDGET_BASIS_IGNORE:
|
||||
period_cost = breakdown["measured_usd"]
|
||||
else:
|
||||
period_cost = breakdown["total_usd"]
|
||||
|
||||
remaining = self.budget_limit_usd - period_cost
|
||||
return remaining > 0, max(0, remaining)
|
||||
|
||||
def budget_denial_detail(self) -> str:
|
||||
"""Human-readable reason a request was refused on budget grounds.
|
||||
|
||||
Built here rather than in the handler so the message can name what the
|
||||
ledger actually knows — specifically how much of the period's spend was
|
||||
booked from Headroom's own token estimate.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
breakdown = self.period_cost_breakdown()
|
||||
estimated_usd = breakdown["estimated_usd"]
|
||||
|
||||
if self.estimated_basis_policy == BUDGET_BASIS_BLOCK and estimated_usd > 0:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"Budget enforcement blocked for {self.budget_period} period: "
|
||||
f"${estimated_usd:.4f} of ${breakdown['total_usd']:.4f} was booked from "
|
||||
"Headroom's own token estimate because the provider returned no usage "
|
||||
f"breakdown, and {ENV_VAR}=block refuses to enforce a budget on an "
|
||||
"estimate. Set it to 'count' or 'ignore' to serve these requests."
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
detail = f"Budget exceeded for {self.budget_period} period"
|
||||
if estimated_usd > 0:
|
||||
detail += (
|
||||
f" (${estimated_usd:.4f} of ${breakdown['total_usd']:.4f} booked from "
|
||||
f"Headroom token estimates, not provider-reported usage)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return detail
|
||||
|
||||
def _get_list_price(self, model: str) -> float | None:
|
||||
"""Get list input price per 1M tokens for a model."""
|
||||
litellm = _get_litellm_module()
|
||||
|
|
@ -956,4 +1106,8 @@ class CostTracker:
|
|||
# `headroom doctor` can report whether a budget is set.
|
||||
"budget_limit_usd": self.budget_limit_usd,
|
||||
"budget_period": self.budget_period,
|
||||
"budget_estimated_basis": self.estimated_basis_policy,
|
||||
# Period spend split by input-count provenance, so estimate-derived
|
||||
# spend stays separable from provider-reported spend (#2713).
|
||||
"budget_basis": self.period_cost_breakdown(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ class AnthropicHandlerMixin:
|
|||
await _finalize_pre_upstream()
|
||||
raise HTTPException(
|
||||
status_code=429,
|
||||
detail=f"Budget exceeded for {self.config.budget_period} period",
|
||||
detail=self.cost_tracker.budget_denial_detail(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Memory: Get user ID when memory is enabled (fallback to "default" for simple DevEx).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -319,6 +319,9 @@ class ProxyConfig:
|
|||
cost_tracking_enabled: bool = True
|
||||
budget_limit_usd: float | None = None
|
||||
budget_period: Literal["hourly", "daily", "monthly"] = "daily"
|
||||
# What spend booked from Headroom's own token estimate (provider returned no
|
||||
# usage breakdown) does to budget enforcement. See budget_basis_policy.
|
||||
budget_estimated_basis: Literal["count", "ignore", "block"] = "count"
|
||||
|
||||
# Logging
|
||||
log_requests: bool = True
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ from headroom.proxy import runtime_env
|
|||
from headroom.proxy.audit import is_auditable_path, record_admin_action
|
||||
from headroom.proxy.auth_mode import should_stamp_codex_client
|
||||
from headroom.proxy.background_compression import BackgroundCompressor
|
||||
from headroom.proxy.budget_basis_policy import resolve_estimated_basis_policy
|
||||
|
||||
# =============================================================================
|
||||
# Extracted modules (re-exported for backward compatibility)
|
||||
|
|
@ -797,6 +798,7 @@ class HeadroomProxy(
|
|||
CostTracker(
|
||||
budget_limit_usd=config.budget_limit_usd,
|
||||
budget_period=config.budget_period,
|
||||
estimated_basis_policy=config.budget_estimated_basis,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if config.cost_tracking_enabled
|
||||
else None
|
||||
|
|
@ -5472,6 +5474,17 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|||
# Cost
|
||||
parser.add_argument("--budget", type=float, help="Budget limit in USD")
|
||||
parser.add_argument("--budget-period", choices=["hourly", "daily", "monthly"], default="daily")
|
||||
parser.add_argument(
|
||||
"--budget-estimated-basis",
|
||||
choices=["count", "ignore", "block"],
|
||||
default=None,
|
||||
help=(
|
||||
"What spend booked from Headroom's own token estimate (provider returned no "
|
||||
"usage breakdown) does to the budget: count it (default), ignore it, or block "
|
||||
"requests rather than enforce the limit on an estimate. "
|
||||
"Env: HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS."
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Logging
|
||||
parser.add_argument("--log-file", help="Log file path")
|
||||
|
|
@ -5574,6 +5587,10 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|||
rate_limit_tokens_per_minute=_get_env_int("HEADROOM_TPM", args.tpm),
|
||||
budget_limit_usd=args.budget,
|
||||
budget_period=args.budget_period,
|
||||
budget_estimated_basis=cast(
|
||||
Literal["count", "ignore", "block"],
|
||||
resolve_estimated_basis_policy(args.budget_estimated_basis, os.environ),
|
||||
),
|
||||
log_file=_get_env_str("HEADROOM_LOG_FILE", args.log_file)
|
||||
if args.log_file
|
||||
else os.environ.get("HEADROOM_LOG_FILE"),
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -204,6 +204,22 @@ SETTINGS: tuple[SettingField, ...] = (
|
|||
help="Period the budget applies to.",
|
||||
tier="basic",
|
||||
),
|
||||
SettingField(
|
||||
"HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS",
|
||||
"budget_estimated_basis",
|
||||
"Estimated-basis spend",
|
||||
"Budget",
|
||||
"enum",
|
||||
default="count",
|
||||
choices=("count", "ignore", "block"),
|
||||
help=(
|
||||
"What spend booked from Headroom's own token estimate does to the budget "
|
||||
"when a provider response carries no input-token breakdown. count: it "
|
||||
"consumes the budget. ignore: only provider-reported spend does. block: "
|
||||
"refuse requests rather than enforce a hard limit on an estimate."
|
||||
),
|
||||
tier="advanced",
|
||||
),
|
||||
# --- Networking (baked into the install manifest on supervised deploys) ---
|
||||
SettingField(
|
||||
"HEADROOM_HOST",
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -852,6 +852,9 @@ class _CostTrackerBlock:
|
|||
def check_budget(self):
|
||||
return False, 0
|
||||
|
||||
def budget_denial_detail(self):
|
||||
return "Budget exceeded for daily period"
|
||||
|
||||
def record_tokens(self, *a, **k):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -444,6 +444,62 @@ class TestBudget:
|
|||
assert result.status == PASS
|
||||
assert "$10.0/daily" in result.summary
|
||||
|
||||
def test_estimated_basis_share_is_reported_without_warning(self):
|
||||
"""#2713: spend booked from a token estimate is surfaced, not warned on.
|
||||
|
||||
A provider that never reports a usage breakdown would otherwise sit at a
|
||||
permanent WARN, so this stays informational.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
result = check_budget(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cost": {
|
||||
"budget_limit_usd": 10.0,
|
||||
"budget_period": "daily",
|
||||
"budget_estimated_basis": "count",
|
||||
"budget_basis": {"estimated_usd": 1.24, "estimated_pct": 62.3},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result.status == PASS
|
||||
assert "62% of period spend ($1.2400)" in result.summary
|
||||
assert "Headroom token estimates" in result.summary
|
||||
|
||||
def test_all_measured_spend_adds_no_note(self):
|
||||
result = check_budget(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cost": {
|
||||
"budget_limit_usd": 10.0,
|
||||
"budget_period": "daily",
|
||||
"budget_estimated_basis": "count",
|
||||
"budget_basis": {"estimated_usd": 0.0, "estimated_pct": 0.0},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result.summary == "$10.0/daily budget enforced"
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_default_basis_policy_is_named(self):
|
||||
result = check_budget(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cost": {
|
||||
"budget_limit_usd": 10.0,
|
||||
"budget_period": "daily",
|
||||
"budget_estimated_basis": "block",
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert "estimated-basis policy: block" in result.summary
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_basis_fields_degrade_quietly(self):
|
||||
"""`doctor` must still work against a proxy predating these fields."""
|
||||
result = check_budget({"cost": {"budget_limit_usd": 10.0, "budget_period": "daily"}})
|
||||
assert result.status == PASS
|
||||
assert result.summary == "$10.0/daily budget enforced"
|
||||
|
||||
malformed = check_budget(
|
||||
{"cost": {"budget_limit_usd": 10.0, "budget_period": "daily", "budget_basis": "nope"}}
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert malformed.status == PASS
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class _FakeManifest:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
306
tests/test_cost_budget_basis.py
Normal file
306
tests/test_cost_budget_basis.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,306 @@
|
|||
"""Budget records must say whether their input count was measured or estimated.
|
||||
|
||||
#2713: when a provider response carries no input-token breakdown,
|
||||
``record_tokens`` substitutes Headroom's own ``tokens_sent`` for the input
|
||||
count. The fallback is right — dropping input cost would under-enforce far
|
||||
worse — but the resulting record used to be indistinguishable from a
|
||||
provider-measured one, so ``check_budget`` (a hard control) could refuse or
|
||||
allow on the strength of a guess with nothing saying so.
|
||||
|
||||
These tests pin the marking, the deduped warning, the separable ledger, and
|
||||
the three operator policies.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
from tests._dotenv import (
|
||||
autouse_apply_env,
|
||||
importorskip_no_env_leak,
|
||||
load_env_overrides,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_env_overrides = load_env_overrides()
|
||||
apply_dotenv = autouse_apply_env(_env_overrides)
|
||||
|
||||
importorskip_no_env_leak("litellm")
|
||||
|
||||
MODEL = "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
|
||||
def _reset_warning_dedup():
|
||||
"""The per-model warn-once set is module-global; keep tests order-independent."""
|
||||
import headroom.proxy.cost as cost_mod
|
||||
|
||||
cost_mod._warned_estimated_basis_models.clear()
|
||||
yield
|
||||
cost_mod._warned_estimated_basis_models.clear()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _tracker(**kwargs):
|
||||
from headroom.proxy.server import CostTracker
|
||||
|
||||
return CostTracker(**kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Basis marking ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_usage_breakdown_books_estimated_basis():
|
||||
"""No breakdown → the record is marked estimated and reported as such."""
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=100.0)
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=50_000, output_tokens=1_000)
|
||||
|
||||
basis = ct.stats()["budget_basis"]
|
||||
assert basis["estimated_usd"] > 0
|
||||
assert basis["measured_usd"] == 0
|
||||
assert basis["estimated_records"] == 1
|
||||
assert basis["estimated_pct"] == 100.0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_provider_breakdown_books_measured_basis():
|
||||
"""A reported breakdown → measured; nothing lands in the estimated bucket."""
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=100.0)
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(
|
||||
MODEL,
|
||||
tokens_saved=0,
|
||||
tokens_sent=50_000,
|
||||
uncached_tokens=30_000,
|
||||
output_tokens=1_000,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
basis = ct.stats()["budget_basis"]
|
||||
assert basis["measured_usd"] > 0
|
||||
assert basis["estimated_usd"] == 0
|
||||
assert basis["estimated_records"] == 0
|
||||
assert basis["estimated_pct"] == 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_cache_read_only_response_counts_as_measured():
|
||||
"""A fully cache-read turn reports usage, so it is not an estimate."""
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=100.0)
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(
|
||||
MODEL,
|
||||
tokens_saved=0,
|
||||
tokens_sent=50_000,
|
||||
cache_read_tokens=40_000,
|
||||
output_tokens=1_000,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert ct.stats()["budget_basis"]["estimated_usd"] == 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mixed_records_stay_separable_and_sum_to_total():
|
||||
"""Default policy is unchanged: the budget still sees every booked dollar."""
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=100.0)
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=50_000, output_tokens=1_000)
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(
|
||||
MODEL,
|
||||
tokens_saved=0,
|
||||
tokens_sent=50_000,
|
||||
uncached_tokens=30_000,
|
||||
output_tokens=1_000,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
basis = ct.stats()["budget_basis"]
|
||||
assert basis["records"] == 2
|
||||
assert basis["estimated_records"] == 1
|
||||
assert basis["measured_usd"] > 0
|
||||
assert basis["estimated_usd"] > 0
|
||||
assert basis["total_usd"] == pytest.approx(basis["measured_usd"] + basis["estimated_usd"])
|
||||
# Regression guard: `count` (the default) enforces against total spend
|
||||
# exactly as it did before this change.
|
||||
assert ct.get_period_cost() == pytest.approx(basis["total_usd"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_get_period_cost_can_filter_by_basis():
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=100.0)
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=50_000, output_tokens=1_000)
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(
|
||||
MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=50_000, uncached_tokens=30_000, output_tokens=1_000
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
measured = ct.get_period_cost("measured")
|
||||
estimated = ct.get_period_cost("estimated")
|
||||
assert measured > 0
|
||||
assert estimated > 0
|
||||
assert ct.get_period_cost() == pytest.approx(measured + estimated)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Warning ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_estimated_basis_warns_once_per_model(caplog):
|
||||
"""A route that never reports usage must not flood proxy.log (cf. #2504)."""
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=100.0)
|
||||
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING, logger="headroom.proxy"):
|
||||
for _ in range(5):
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=10_000, output_tokens=100)
|
||||
|
||||
hits = [r for r in caplog.records if "budget basis estimated" in r.getMessage()]
|
||||
assert len(hits) == 1
|
||||
assert MODEL in hits[0].getMessage()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_distinct_models_each_warn_once(caplog):
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=100.0)
|
||||
other = "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"
|
||||
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING, logger="headroom.proxy"):
|
||||
for model in (MODEL, MODEL, other, other):
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(model, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=10_000, output_tokens=100)
|
||||
|
||||
msgs = [r.getMessage() for r in caplog.records if "budget basis estimated" in r.getMessage()]
|
||||
assert sum(MODEL in m for m in msgs) == 1
|
||||
assert sum(other in m for m in msgs) == 1
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_measured_records_do_not_warn(caplog):
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=100.0)
|
||||
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING, logger="headroom.proxy"):
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(
|
||||
MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=10_000, uncached_tokens=9_000, output_tokens=100
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert not [r for r in caplog.records if "budget basis estimated" in r.getMessage()]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Enforcement policies ─────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_count_policy_lets_estimated_spend_exhaust_the_budget():
|
||||
"""Default: an estimate consumes the budget, as it always has."""
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=0.0001, estimated_basis_policy="count")
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=500_000, output_tokens=10_000)
|
||||
|
||||
allowed, remaining = ct.check_budget()
|
||||
assert not allowed
|
||||
assert remaining == 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ignore_policy_keeps_estimated_spend_out_of_enforcement():
|
||||
"""`ignore`: the record is still booked and reported, but doesn't enforce."""
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=0.0001, estimated_basis_policy="ignore")
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=500_000, output_tokens=10_000)
|
||||
|
||||
allowed, _remaining = ct.check_budget()
|
||||
assert allowed
|
||||
# Still visible in the ledger — ignored for enforcement, not dropped.
|
||||
assert ct.stats()["budget_basis"]["estimated_usd"] > 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ignore_policy_still_enforces_measured_spend():
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=0.0001, estimated_basis_policy="ignore")
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(
|
||||
MODEL,
|
||||
tokens_saved=0,
|
||||
tokens_sent=500_000,
|
||||
uncached_tokens=500_000,
|
||||
output_tokens=10_000,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
allowed, _remaining = ct.check_budget()
|
||||
assert not allowed
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_block_policy_refuses_once_any_estimated_spend_exists():
|
||||
"""`block`: fail closed rather than enforce a hard limit on a guess."""
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=1_000_000.0, estimated_basis_policy="block")
|
||||
allowed, _remaining = ct.check_budget()
|
||||
assert allowed # nothing booked yet
|
||||
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=1_000, output_tokens=10)
|
||||
|
||||
allowed, remaining = ct.check_budget()
|
||||
assert not allowed
|
||||
assert remaining == 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_block_policy_is_inert_without_a_budget_limit():
|
||||
"""No limit configured means no hard control to protect."""
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=None, estimated_basis_policy="block")
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=1_000, output_tokens=10)
|
||||
|
||||
allowed, remaining = ct.check_budget()
|
||||
assert allowed
|
||||
assert remaining == float("inf")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_block_policy_allows_purely_measured_traffic():
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=1_000_000.0, estimated_basis_policy="block")
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(
|
||||
MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=1_000, uncached_tokens=900, output_tokens=10
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
allowed, _remaining = ct.check_budget()
|
||||
assert allowed
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_invalid_policy_falls_back_to_count():
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=0.0001, estimated_basis_policy="nonsense")
|
||||
assert ct.estimated_basis_policy == "count"
|
||||
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=500_000, output_tokens=10_000)
|
||||
allowed, _remaining = ct.check_budget()
|
||||
assert not allowed
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Denial message ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_denial_detail_names_the_estimated_share():
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=0.0001)
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=500_000, output_tokens=10_000)
|
||||
|
||||
detail = ct.budget_denial_detail()
|
||||
assert "Budget exceeded for daily period" in detail
|
||||
assert "Headroom token estimates" in detail
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_denial_detail_unchanged_for_purely_measured_spend():
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=0.0001)
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(
|
||||
MODEL,
|
||||
tokens_saved=0,
|
||||
tokens_sent=500_000,
|
||||
uncached_tokens=500_000,
|
||||
output_tokens=10_000,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert ct.budget_denial_detail() == "Budget exceeded for daily period"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_block_denial_is_distinguishable_from_overspend():
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=1_000_000.0, estimated_basis_policy="block")
|
||||
ct.record_tokens(MODEL, tokens_saved=0, tokens_sent=1_000, output_tokens=10)
|
||||
|
||||
detail = ct.budget_denial_detail()
|
||||
assert "Budget enforcement blocked" in detail
|
||||
assert "HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS=block" in detail
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Policy resolver ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_resolver_precedence_and_fallback():
|
||||
from headroom.proxy.budget_basis_policy import resolve_estimated_basis_policy
|
||||
|
||||
env = {"HEADROOM_BUDGET_ESTIMATED_BASIS": "ignore"}
|
||||
assert resolve_estimated_basis_policy("block", env) == "block" # explicit wins
|
||||
assert resolve_estimated_basis_policy(None, env) == "ignore" # env next
|
||||
assert resolve_estimated_basis_policy(None, {}) == "count" # default
|
||||
assert resolve_estimated_basis_policy(None, None) == "count"
|
||||
assert resolve_estimated_basis_policy("BLOCK", None) == "block" # normalized
|
||||
assert resolve_estimated_basis_policy("nope", None) == "count" # fallback
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stats_reports_the_active_policy():
|
||||
ct = _tracker(budget_limit_usd=10.0, estimated_basis_policy="block")
|
||||
assert ct.stats()["budget_estimated_basis"] == "block"
|
||||
assert ct.stats()["budget_basis"]["policy"] == "block"
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue