53be64ca12
## Description
Removes the anonymous-telemetry **beacon** — the only external,
third-party data flow Headroom ever initiated. When telemetry was opted
in, it POSTed aggregate `/stats` to a hardcoded **Supabase** REST
endpoint (with an embedded anon API key in the source). For
enterprise/on-prem deployments this is exactly the kind of
vendor-controlled data egress a security review flags, so it's gone
entirely — **zero "Supabase" references remain in the codebase.**
What stays (by design): the **local** telemetry collector + the
`HEADROOM_TELEMETRY` opt-in (it only feeds `/stats` and `/v1/telemetry`
— nothing leaves the process), **OpenTelemetry export**
(`HEADROOM_OTEL_METRICS_*`, so operators send operational metrics to
*their own* collector), and the license usage reporter (your own domain,
license-key-gated).
Also fixes the contact domain: `headroom.dev` → `headroomlabs.ai`
everywhere.
Closes # (no tracking issue)
## Type of Change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update
- [ ] Performance improvement
- [x] Code refactoring (no functional changes)
> Non-breaking: `HEADROOM_TELEMETRY` is still accepted (now gates local
collection only). The only behavior change is that no telemetry is ever
sent externally.
## Changes Made
- **Deleted the Supabase beacon**: `TelemetryBeacon` class,
`_SUPABASE_URL`/`_SUPABASE_KEY`/`_TABLE`/`_ENDPOINT`, the JSONB
projection helper, the proxy-lifespan beacon wiring, the `SUPABASE_`
install env passthrough, and `tests/test_strategy_stats_supabase.py`.
- **Kept** the local opt-in predicate (`is_telemetry_enabled` etc.) in
`beacon.py` — still used by the local collector + CLI — reworded to
"local only".
- **Retained** the single-worker-owner file lock (the cc-switch
reconciler depends on it); updated its comments to drop the beacon
framing.
- `/stats` `anon_telemetry_shipping` is now always `False` (nothing
ships externally); startup log reworded to "Local telemetry".
- Reworded remaining "Supabase" comments in `collector.py`,
`context.py`, `prometheus_metrics.py`, and two test docstrings.
- Contact domain: `security@headroom.dev` → `security@headroomlabs.ai`,
`conduct@headroom.dev` → `conduct@headroomlabs.ai`, FUNDING.yml sponsor
URL.
## Testing
- [x] Unit tests pass (`pytest`)
- [x] Linting passes (`ruff check`)
- [x] Type checking passes (`mypy`)
- [x] New tests added for new functionality
- [x] Manual testing performed
### Test Output
```text
$ grep -rniI "supabase" --include=*.py --include=*.md --include=*.mdx . # (excl .venv/sbom)
>>> ZERO Supabase references
$ grep -rniI "headroom.dev" .
>>> ZERO headroom.dev references
$ ruff check <changed files> -> All checks passed!
$ ruff format --check <changed files> -> 10 files already formatted
$ mypy <changed telemetry files> -> Success: no issues found
$ pytest tests/test_telemetry.py tests/test_telemetry_warning.py \
tests/test_proxy_telemetry_env.py tests/test_compression_observability.py \
tests/test_paths.py tests/test_paths_backward_compat.py -q
============================= 173 passed in 6.67s ==============================
```
## Real Behavior Proof
- **Environment:** macOS, Python 3.12 (`.venv`).
- **Exact command / steps:** repo-wide grep for
`supabase`/`headroom.dev`; `create_app(...)` driven through a full
`TestClient` lifespan (startup + shutdown) in
`test_proxy_telemetry_env.py`; `/stats` exercised in
`test_telemetry_warning.py`.
- **Observed result:** zero `supabase`/`headroom.dev` strings remain;
the proxy starts and shuts down cleanly with the beacon removed (the
worker-owner lock + reconciler still elect a single owner);
`/stats.anon_telemetry_shipping` is `False` even with
`HEADROOM_TELEMETRY=on`; local collector + OTEL paths unchanged.
- **Not tested:** no live network call was ever made (the point — the
external POST is gone). OTEL export and the license reporter were not
exercised (unchanged by this PR).
## Review Readiness
- [x] I have performed a self-review
- [x] This PR is ready for human review
## Checklist
- [x] My code follows the project's style guidelines
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] I have updated the CHANGELOG.md if applicable
## Additional Notes
- The license usage reporter (`reporter.py` → `app.headroomlabs.ai`) is
intentionally **kept** — it's license-key-gated (dormant for
unlicensed/OSS deployments) and goes to your own domain, not a third
party.
- Docs/CHANGELOG left unchecked: a couple of docs mention the telemetry
beacon and may want a follow-up note that it now collects locally only;
happy to add.
5.4 KiB
Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
Our Pledge
We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming, diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.
Our Standards
Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our community include:
- Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
- Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
- Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
- Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes, and learning from the experience
- Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall community
Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
- The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or advances of any kind
- Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
- Public or private harassment
- Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email address, without their explicit permission
- Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting
Enforcement Responsibilities
Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful.
Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation decisions when appropriate.
Scope
This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces. Examples of representing our community include using an official email address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event.
Enforcement
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at conduct@headroomlabs.ai.
All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.
All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the reporter of any incident.
Enforcement Guidelines
Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct:
1. Correction
Community Impact: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed unprofessional or unwelcome in the community.
Consequence: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested.
2. Warning
Community Impact: A violation through a single incident or series of actions.
Consequence: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or permanent ban.
3. Temporary Ban
Community Impact: A serious violation of community standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior.
Consequence: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period. Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban.
4. Permanent Ban
Community Impact: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals.
Consequence: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within the community.
Attribution
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, version 2.1, available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.html.
Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by Mozilla's code of conduct enforcement ladder.
For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq. Translations are available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations.