mirror of
https://github.com/headroomlabs-ai/headroom.git
synced 2026-08-27 14:17:10 -04:00
## Description Stops the recurring **CHANGELOG cascade** where several concurrent PRs all edit `CHANGELOG.md`'s `## Unreleased` section, so the first to merge turns the rest `DIRTY` — forcing a serial rebase-per-merge grind. Root cause: **release-please already generates `CHANGELOG.md`** from Conventional Commit titles (see `.release-please-config.json` `changelog-sections`), so the hand-written `## Unreleased` entries are *both redundant with release-please and the sole source of the conflicts*. The PR template and CONTRIBUTING were actively telling contributors to keep hand-editing it. `.gitattributes merge=union` (#2138) does not help — GitHub squash-merge ignores merge drivers. Fix: make release-please the only author of the changelog and stop hand-edits at the source. Closes # ## Type of Change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue) — CI/process ## Changes Made - **`.github/workflows/changelog-guard.yml`** (new): fails any PR that modifies `CHANGELOG.md`, except release-please's own release PR (head branch `release-please--*`). Uses the preinstalled `gh` CLI — no third-party action to pin. - **`.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md`**: flips the "I have updated the CHANGELOG.md" checkbox to "I did **not** edit CHANGELOG.md — release-please generates it from my Conventional Commit PR title." - **`CONTRIBUTING.md`**: replaces step 6 ("Update `CHANGELOG.md`") with the release-please policy. ## Testing - [x] `actionlint .github/workflows/changelog-guard.yml` — clean - [x] YAML parses (`yaml.safe_load`) - [x] Guard match logic unit-checked locally: fires on root `CHANGELOG.md`, ignores nested paths (`docs/CHANGELOG.md`) and PRs that don't touch it. ### Test Output ```text YAML OK actionlint OK root CHANGELOG.md -> FIRES nested docs/CHANGELOG.md -> pass no changelog -> pass ``` ## Real Behavior Proof - Environment: local clone + `actionlint`. - Exact steps: created the workflow, validated with actionlint + a YAML parse, and exercised the `grep -qx 'CHANGELOG.md'` decision against representative changed-file lists. - Observed result: guard fires only on a root-level `CHANGELOG.md` edit; the release-please branch is exempted via the job-level `if`. - Not tested: a live PR run in Actions (will exercise on this PR itself — note this PR does **not** touch `CHANGELOG.md`, so the guard should pass green here). ## Additional Notes - To *enforce* (block merge, not just show red), add **Changelog Guard / no-manual-changelog** to the branch's required status checks. - Follow-up: the ~10 currently-open PRs that hand-edit `CHANGELOG.md` will need that edit removed (a clean deletion now, not a conflict resolution) before they merge — after which the cascade is gone for good.
133 lines
5.7 KiB
Markdown
133 lines
5.7 KiB
Markdown
# Contributing to Headroom
|
|
|
|
Thanks for contributing! Please skim this before opening a PR : the policies exist because we've been burned skipping them, not because we love paperwork.
|
|
|
|
By participating, you agree to our [Code of Conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
|
|
|
|
## Where does my contribution go?
|
|
|
|
| Type | What to do |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| 🐛 Bug or small fix | **Open a PR** (with repro + test) |
|
|
| ✨ New feature / architectural change | **Open an issue or ask in Discord first.** |
|
|
| 🧹 Refactor-only | **Don't.** Only if a maintainer asked, as part of a concrete fix. |
|
|
| 🧪 Test/CI-only PR chasing a known `main` failure | **Don't.** We're tracking it. |
|
|
| 📦 New dep or version bump | **PR with written justification.** |
|
|
| ❓ Question | Ask in **Discord `#help`** |
|
|
|
|
**Open PR cap: 10 per author.** Get existing ones merged before opening more.
|
|
|
|
## Guiding principles
|
|
|
|
- **Verification is the author's job, not the reviewer's.**
|
|
- **Supply chain is a real threat.** Dependency changes get human review, every time.
|
|
|
|
## Bug fixes
|
|
|
|
Every bug-fix PR must include:
|
|
|
|
1. **A reproduction** — minimal code, failing test, or steps.
|
|
2. **A test that fails before your fix and passes after** (unit, integration, or e2e).
|
|
|
|
If you genuinely can't write a test, say so explicitly and explain how you verified.
|
|
|
|
## "Real behavior proof" — required on every external PR
|
|
|
|
We can't merge what we can't verify. Include a **`Real behavior proof`** section in the PR body covering:
|
|
|
|
- **Setup you tested on** (OS, Python, config, provider/model)
|
|
- **Exact command or steps you ran after the patch**
|
|
- **After-fix evidence** + **observed result**
|
|
- **What you did *not* test**
|
|
|
|
✅ Counts: screenshots, recordings, terminal output, copied live output, linked artifacts, redacted runtime logs.
|
|
❌ Does **not** count alone: unit tests, mocks, snapshots, lint, typechecks, green CI. Have them too — but they prove the test passes, not that the feature works.
|
|
|
|
**PRs missing this may be autoclosed.**
|
|
|
|
## New features
|
|
|
|
Before writing code:
|
|
|
|
1. **Open a feature-request issue** (or raise in Discord).
|
|
2. **Get a 👍 from a core maintainer** before implementing.
|
|
3. **Include a short spec** covering:
|
|
- **API surface** (public functions, config, CLI flags)
|
|
- **Changes to existing behavior**
|
|
- **User stories** — Given / When / Then, golden path + one edge case
|
|
- **Failure modes**
|
|
- **Recovery / resilience**
|
|
- **Security considerations**
|
|
|
|
Short and concrete beats long.
|
|
|
|
## Dependencies & supply chain
|
|
|
|
A human maintainer reviews every dep change. PRs that add or bump a package must justify:
|
|
|
|
- **Why this package** (vs. doing it ourselves / using existing deps)
|
|
- **Who maintains it** (activity, release cadence, security history)
|
|
- **Install surface** (transitive deps, native code, install/runtime network)
|
|
- **Why this version** — permitted reasons: **bug fix**, **security patch**, **required new functionality**. Cosmetic bumps will be closed.
|
|
|
|
## PR workflow
|
|
|
|
1. Fork, branch from `main`.
|
|
2. Install **Node 18+** and run `uv sync --extra dev` then `make install-git-hooks` — installs repo pre-commit checks on every commit, commitlint on every commit message, and ci-precheck on every push.
|
|
3. One logical change per PR.
|
|
4. Add tests.
|
|
5. `uv run pytest` · `uv run ruff check .` · `uv run ruff format .`
|
|
6. Do **not** edit `CHANGELOG.md` — release-please generates it from your Conventional Commit PR title, so a clear `fix(...)`/`feat(...)` title *is* your changelog entry. A CI guard rejects manual edits.
|
|
7. Open the PR with a clear description + `Real behavior proof` + any spec/justification required, and keep the PR in draft until the `Review Readiness` boxes are complete.
|
|
|
|
**Title format** (conventional commits): `feat:`, `fix:`, `docs:`, `test:`, `refactor:`.
|
|
|
|
**Commit message format** is enforced locally by the repo's `commit-msg` hook and again in CI.
|
|
|
|
**Review:** CI green, one maintainer review, coverage held/improved.
|
|
|
|
## Development setup
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
git clone https://github.com/chopratejas/headroom.git
|
|
cd headroom
|
|
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
|
|
node --version # Node 18+ required for commitlint hooks
|
|
python -m pip install --upgrade pip
|
|
python -m pip install -e ".[dev,relevance,proxy]"
|
|
python -m pytest
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Headroom uses a `pyproject.toml`/`maturin` build backend. Older `pip`
|
|
versions may fail editable installs by looking for `setup.py`; upgrade `pip`
|
|
first or use `uv sync --extra dev`.
|
|
|
|
### Dev Containers
|
|
|
|
Two configs ship for VS Code / Codespaces:
|
|
|
|
- **`.devcontainer/devcontainer.json`** — Python 3.12, `uv`, Node.js, `gh`.
|
|
- **`.devcontainer/memory-stack/devcontainer.json`** — adds Qdrant + Neo4j sidecars (use `qdrant:6333`, `neo4j://neo4j:7687`).
|
|
|
|
Inside, use: `uv run ruff check .`, `uv run pytest`, etc.
|
|
|
|
## Optional automated review
|
|
|
|
This repository includes `.github/copilot-instructions.md` so maintainers can opt into GitHub Copilot code review without adding workflow billing noise to every PR.
|
|
|
|
Enable or disable automatic Copilot review in **Settings → Rules → Rulesets → Automatically request Copilot code review**. Keep it off unless maintainers explicitly want the extra review traffic.
|
|
|
|
## Coding standards
|
|
|
|
- [Ruff](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff) for lint + format, line length 100, PEP 8.
|
|
- Type hints on public functions; Google-style docstrings.
|
|
- Cover new behavior + edge cases; aim >80% coverage on new code.
|
|
- Python 3.10+. Optional features go behind extras.
|
|
|
|
## Architecture principles
|
|
|
|
**Safety first:** never drop user/assistant content, never break tool call/response pairing, malformed content passes through unchanged, prefer false negatives.
|
|
|
|
**Performance:** transforms <50ms at P99, lazy-load optional deps, profile before optimizing.
|
|
|
|
Contributors are credited in `CHANGELOG`, the GitHub contributors page, and release notes. Thanks again. 💚
|