headroom/wiki/LIMITATIONS.md
Tejas Chopra 10251b65ca
docs: sync README + benchmarks with code (drop retired IntelligentContext/RollingWindow) (#1545)
## Description

Sync the docs with the code after the live-zone realignment. The
`IntelligentContextManager` (ICM), `RollingWindow`, and scoring modules
were deleted in PR #350 (May 2026), but the README and benchmark
docstrings still advertised them as live, and an example still imported
the deleted module (broken on run). This fixes the README + benchmarks
and removes the dead example.

I validated the README against the code with three parallel
static-analysis sub-agents (features/architecture,
CLI/extras/wrap-matrix, public API/integrations). Most of the README
checked out accurate; only the items below were stale/wrong.

Closes #

## Type of Change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
- [ ] Performance improvement
- [ ] Code refactoring (no functional changes)

## Changes Made

- README: removed the `IntelligentContext` bullet and
`IntelligentContext / RollingWindow` from the transforms list (both
deleted in PR #350).
- README: standardized `Kompress-base` -> `Kompress-v2-base` to match
the HF model id `chopratejas/kompress-v2-base` and the existing badges
(diagram re-aligned).
- README: corrected the CodeCompressor language list to match the
`CodeLanguage` enum (added TS, C, Perl).
- README: softened the unanchored "6 algorithms" tagline to
"content-aware compressors".
- README: Cortex Code is library-mode only — there is no `headroom wrap
cortex`, so the compatibility-matrix row no longer shows a wrap
checkmark.
- Deleted `examples/test_intelligent_context_toin_ccr.py` — it imported
the deleted `IntelligentContextManager` (ImportError on run) and is
unreferenced.
- Removed stale `RollingWindow` mentions from benchmark
docstrings/comments (`benchmarks/__init__.py`, `bench_transforms.py`,
`bench_latency.py`, `scenarios/conversations.py`); the accurate PR-B1
retirement comment is kept.

## Testing

- [ ] Unit tests pass (`pytest`) — N/A, docs/docstring + example
deletion only
- [x] Linting passes — `ruff check` clean on all changed benchmark files
- [ ] Type checking passes — N/A (no type-relevant changes)
- [ ] New tests added — N/A
- [x] Manual testing performed — see Real Behavior Proof

### Test Output

```text
$ ruff check benchmarks/__init__.py benchmarks/bench_transforms.py benchmarks/bench_latency.py benchmarks/scenarios/conversations.py
All checks passed!

# stale refs remaining in README/benchmarks (excluding accurate retirement notes):
$ grep -rn "IntelligentContext|RollingWindow|Kompress-base" README.md benchmarks/ | grep -v retire
(only benchmarks/bench_transforms.py:362 — the accurate PR-B1 retirement comment)

# deleted example is unreferenced anywhere:
$ grep -rn "test_intelligent_context_toin_ccr" --include=*.md --include=*.yml --include=*.py .
(no hits)
```

## Real Behavior Proof

- Environment: macOS (darwin, arm64), Python 3.12 `.venv`, ruff 0.14.x,
repo at branch `docs/sync-readme-with-code` off latest `main`.
- Exact command / steps: (1) three parallel sub-agents
grep/Read-validated README claims vs `headroom/`, `pyproject.toml`,
`sdk/typescript/`; (2) directly verified each flagged mismatch
(`CodeLanguage` enum, `HF_MODEL_ID`, absence of
`IntelligentContext`/`RollingWindow` classes); (3) confirmed the example
imports a deleted module and is unreferenced; (4) `ruff check` on
changed benchmark files; (5) re-grepped README + benchmarks for any
remaining stale refs.
- Observed result: README and benchmark docstrings now match the code;
the only surviving `RollingWindow` string is the accurate retirement
comment; the broken example is removed; ruff passes; the ASCII
architecture diagram still aligns after the `Kompress-v2-base` rename.
- Not tested: rendering of the README on GitHub/PyPI (text-only change);
the separate `docs/content/` and `wiki/` doc sets (see Additional Notes
— out of scope for this PR).

## Review Readiness

- [x] I have performed a self-review
- [x] This PR is ready for human review

## Checklist

- [x] My code follows the project's style guidelines
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective — N/A
(docs/example cleanup)
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] I have updated the CHANGELOG.md — N/A (Release Please
auto-generates from the conventional commit)

## Additional Notes

**Larger related finding (NOT in this PR):** the published docs site
(`docs/content/docs/*.mdx`) and the `wiki/*.md` set still document
`IntelligentContextManager`, `RollingWindow`, `RollingWindowConfig`,
`IntelligentContextConfig`, and `ScoringWeights` as live API — with
`from headroom import RollingWindow` / `from headroom.transforms import
IntelligentContextManager` code examples that would `ImportError`. It is
half-migrated (a couple of `.mdx` files already note "removed in 0.9.x"
while neighbors still teach it as current). This is ~15 files and the
fixes require rewriting examples to the live-zone model, not just
deletions — recommended as a focused follow-up PR rather than bundling
it here.
2026-06-28 22:36:41 -07:00

139 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Headroom Limitations & Known Behavior
Honest documentation of when Headroom helps, when it doesn't, and what to watch out for.
## When Headroom Helps (and When It Doesn't)
| Content Type | Compression | Latency Impact | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| **JSON: Arrays of dicts** (search results, API responses, DB rows) | 86-100% | Net latency win on Sonnet/Opus | Primary use case — always use |
| **JSON: Arrays of strings** (file paths, log lines, tags) | 60-90% | Net latency win | New — works with all string arrays |
| **JSON: Arrays of numbers** (metrics, time series) | 70-85% | Net latency win | New — includes statistical summary |
| **JSON: Mixed-type arrays** | 50-70% | Net latency win | New — groups by type, compresses each |
| **Structured logs** (as JSON) | 82-95% | Net latency win | Log entries in tool outputs |
| **Agentic conversations** (25-50 turns) | 56-81% | Break-even to net win | Multi-tool agent sessions |
| **Plain text** (documentation, articles) | 43-46% | Adds latency (cost savings only) | Cost optimization, not speed |
| **Code** | Passthrough | Minimal overhead | See [Code Compression](#code-compression) |
| **RAG document contexts** | Passthrough | Minimal overhead | Not compressed (plain text in user messages) |
See [LATENCY_BENCHMARKS.md](LATENCY_BENCHMARKS.md) for full data with per-scenario timing.
## Code Compression
Headroom includes an AST-aware CodeCompressor (tree-sitter, 8 languages) but it's gated behind safety protections that prevent it from firing in most real-world scenarios. This is intentional.
**Why code mostly passes through:**
1. **Word count gate**: Content under 50 words is silently skipped
2. **Recent code protection** (`protect_recent_code=4`): Code in the last 4 messages is never compressed. In typical tool-call patterns, the tool result is always "recent"
3. **Analysis intent protection** (`protect_analysis_context=True`): If the most recent user message contains keywords like "analyze", "review", "explain", "fix", "debug", "optimize", "error", "bug" — ALL code in the conversation is protected
**Why this is the right default**: Code is almost always fetched because the user wants to work with it. Compressing function bodies would remove exactly what they need. LLMs like Claude are excellent at navigating large code files without compression.
**Where code savings come from**: Headroom does not strip function bodies from active code or drop old code messages. Code savings come from compressing the newest content blocks (live-zone-only compression) when they are not protected, leaving the conversation history intact.
**Override**: Set `protect_analysis_context=False` in `ContentRouterConfig` for aggressive code compression. Requires `headroom-ai[code]` for tree-sitter.
## JSON Compression Constraints
### What gets compressed
- Arrays of **dicts**: Full statistical analysis with adaptive K (Kneedle algorithm)
- Arrays of **strings**: Dedup + adaptive sampling + error preservation
- Arrays of **numbers**: Statistical summary + outlier/change-point preservation
- **Mixed-type** arrays: Grouped by type, each group compressed independently
- **Nested** objects: Recursed into, arrays within are compressed (up to depth 5)
### What passes through
- Arrays below 5 items (`min_items_to_analyze`)
- Content below 200 tokens (`min_tokens_to_crush`)
- Bool-only arrays (not useful to compress)
- JSON objects without array values
- Malformed JSON (silently passes through, no error)
- Non-JSON content (handled by other pipeline stages)
### Edge cases
- **NaN/Infinity** in numeric fields: Filtered out before statistics are computed
- **Nesting depth > 5**: Inner arrays not examined for compression
- **Mixed-type arrays with small groups**: Groups below `min_items_to_analyze` are kept as-is
## Adaptive K: How Item Retention Works
SmartCrusher doesn't use fixed K values. It uses information-theoretic sizing:
1. **Kneedle algorithm** on bigram coverage curves finds the point where adding more items stops providing new information
2. **SimHash** fingerprinting detects near-duplicate items
3. **zlib validation** ensures the subset captures the full set's diversity
4. The resulting K is split: 30% from array start, 15% from end, 55% for importance-scored items
**Safety guarantees (additive, never dropped):**
- Error items (containing "error", "exception", "failed", "critical", etc.) — across ALL array types
- Numeric anomalies (> 2σ from mean)
- String length anomalies (> 2σ from mean length)
- Change points (sudden shifts in running values)
These are kept even if they exceed the K budget.
## ML Text Compression (Kompress, opt-in)
- **Requires**: `headroom-ai[ml]` — downloads model weights and needs GPU/CPU RAM for inference
- **First call**: model-load latency (cached globally after)
- **Latency**: Adds overhead that doesn't break even on fast models. Use for **cost savings**, not speed
- **Thread safety**: Single global model instance with lock — sequential access under concurrency
> The earlier LLMLingua-2 integration (`headroom-ai[llmlingua]`) was retired and is no longer installable.
## Error Handling
All compressors follow the same principle: **fail gracefully, return original content unchanged**.
- Invalid JSON → passthrough (no error raised)
- AST parse failure in CodeCompressor → falls back to original
- Compression makes output larger → original returned
- Missing optional dependencies (tree-sitter, ML stack) → passthrough with warning log
Errors are logged at WARNING level and never propagated to callers.
## TOIN Cold Start
The Tool Output Intelligence Network (TOIN) learns compression patterns from usage. For new tool types:
- No learned patterns exist → falls back to statistical heuristics
- Confidence below `toin_confidence_threshold` (default 0.3) → TOIN hints ignored
- Patterns build up over time as tools are used repeatedly
- Cross-session learning requires persistence (`TelemetryConfig.storage_path`)
## CacheAligner Behavior
- Only processes **system messages** for dynamic content extraction
- Dynamic content in user/assistant/tool messages is not extracted
- May add small markers (`[Dynamic Context]` separator) that slightly increase token count
- Whitespace normalization may affect content with significant indentation (code blocks, ASCII art)
## Provider Interactions
- CacheAligner is designed to maximize Anthropic/OpenAI prefix cache hit rates
- Token counting uses model-specific tokenizers (tiktoken for OpenAI, calibrated estimation for Anthropic)
- Compression works with all providers — no provider-specific limitations
- Compressed content is valid JSON — downstream tools and parsers work unchanged
## Performance Characteristics
- **ContentRouter** accounts for 91-98% of pipeline cost — it does the actual compression work
- **CacheAligner** is sub-millisecond
- Scaling is roughly **linear** with input size
- Full benchmark data: [LATENCY_BENCHMARKS.md](LATENCY_BENCHMARKS.md)
## Configuration Tuning
| Parameter | Default | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| `min_items_to_analyze` | 5 | Arrays below this pass through |
| `min_tokens_to_crush` | 200 | Content below this passes through |
| `max_items_after_crush` | 15 | Upper bound on retained items |
| `variance_threshold` | 2.0 | Std devs for anomaly detection (lower = more preserved) |
| `first_fraction` | 0.3 | Fraction of K allocated to array start |
| `last_fraction` | 0.15 | Fraction of K allocated to array end |
| `protect_analysis_context` | True | Protect code when user asks about it |
| `protect_recent_code` | 4 | Messages from end to protect code |
| `skip_user_messages` | True | Never compress user messages |
| `toin_confidence_threshold` | 0.3 | Minimum TOIN confidence to apply hints |