headroom/wiki/ccr.md
Tejas Chopra 10251b65ca
docs: sync README + benchmarks with code (drop retired IntelligentContext/RollingWindow) (#1545)
## Description

Sync the docs with the code after the live-zone realignment. The
`IntelligentContextManager` (ICM), `RollingWindow`, and scoring modules
were deleted in PR #350 (May 2026), but the README and benchmark
docstrings still advertised them as live, and an example still imported
the deleted module (broken on run). This fixes the README + benchmarks
and removes the dead example.

I validated the README against the code with three parallel
static-analysis sub-agents (features/architecture,
CLI/extras/wrap-matrix, public API/integrations). Most of the README
checked out accurate; only the items below were stale/wrong.

Closes #

## Type of Change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
- [ ] Performance improvement
- [ ] Code refactoring (no functional changes)

## Changes Made

- README: removed the `IntelligentContext` bullet and
`IntelligentContext / RollingWindow` from the transforms list (both
deleted in PR #350).
- README: standardized `Kompress-base` -> `Kompress-v2-base` to match
the HF model id `chopratejas/kompress-v2-base` and the existing badges
(diagram re-aligned).
- README: corrected the CodeCompressor language list to match the
`CodeLanguage` enum (added TS, C, Perl).
- README: softened the unanchored "6 algorithms" tagline to
"content-aware compressors".
- README: Cortex Code is library-mode only — there is no `headroom wrap
cortex`, so the compatibility-matrix row no longer shows a wrap
checkmark.
- Deleted `examples/test_intelligent_context_toin_ccr.py` — it imported
the deleted `IntelligentContextManager` (ImportError on run) and is
unreferenced.
- Removed stale `RollingWindow` mentions from benchmark
docstrings/comments (`benchmarks/__init__.py`, `bench_transforms.py`,
`bench_latency.py`, `scenarios/conversations.py`); the accurate PR-B1
retirement comment is kept.

## Testing

- [ ] Unit tests pass (`pytest`) — N/A, docs/docstring + example
deletion only
- [x] Linting passes — `ruff check` clean on all changed benchmark files
- [ ] Type checking passes — N/A (no type-relevant changes)
- [ ] New tests added — N/A
- [x] Manual testing performed — see Real Behavior Proof

### Test Output

```text
$ ruff check benchmarks/__init__.py benchmarks/bench_transforms.py benchmarks/bench_latency.py benchmarks/scenarios/conversations.py
All checks passed!

# stale refs remaining in README/benchmarks (excluding accurate retirement notes):
$ grep -rn "IntelligentContext|RollingWindow|Kompress-base" README.md benchmarks/ | grep -v retire
(only benchmarks/bench_transforms.py:362 — the accurate PR-B1 retirement comment)

# deleted example is unreferenced anywhere:
$ grep -rn "test_intelligent_context_toin_ccr" --include=*.md --include=*.yml --include=*.py .
(no hits)
```

## Real Behavior Proof

- Environment: macOS (darwin, arm64), Python 3.12 `.venv`, ruff 0.14.x,
repo at branch `docs/sync-readme-with-code` off latest `main`.
- Exact command / steps: (1) three parallel sub-agents
grep/Read-validated README claims vs `headroom/`, `pyproject.toml`,
`sdk/typescript/`; (2) directly verified each flagged mismatch
(`CodeLanguage` enum, `HF_MODEL_ID`, absence of
`IntelligentContext`/`RollingWindow` classes); (3) confirmed the example
imports a deleted module and is unreferenced; (4) `ruff check` on
changed benchmark files; (5) re-grepped README + benchmarks for any
remaining stale refs.
- Observed result: README and benchmark docstrings now match the code;
the only surviving `RollingWindow` string is the accurate retirement
comment; the broken example is removed; ruff passes; the ASCII
architecture diagram still aligns after the `Kompress-v2-base` rename.
- Not tested: rendering of the README on GitHub/PyPI (text-only change);
the separate `docs/content/` and `wiki/` doc sets (see Additional Notes
— out of scope for this PR).

## Review Readiness

- [x] I have performed a self-review
- [x] This PR is ready for human review

## Checklist

- [x] My code follows the project's style guidelines
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective — N/A
(docs/example cleanup)
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] I have updated the CHANGELOG.md — N/A (Release Please
auto-generates from the conventional commit)

## Additional Notes

**Larger related finding (NOT in this PR):** the published docs site
(`docs/content/docs/*.mdx`) and the `wiki/*.md` set still document
`IntelligentContextManager`, `RollingWindow`, `RollingWindowConfig`,
`IntelligentContextConfig`, and `ScoringWeights` as live API — with
`from headroom import RollingWindow` / `from headroom.transforms import
IntelligentContextManager` code examples that would `ImportError`. It is
half-migrated (a couple of `.mdx` files already note "removed in 0.9.x"
while neighbors still teach it as current). This is ~15 files and the
fixes require rewriting examples to the live-zone model, not just
deletions — recommended as a focused follow-up PR rather than bundling
it here.
2026-06-28 22:36:41 -07:00

178 lines
7.8 KiB
Markdown

# CCR: Compress-Cache-Retrieve
Headroom's CCR architecture makes compression **reversible**. When content is compressed, the original data is cached. If the LLM needs more data, it can retrieve it instantly.
## The Problem with Traditional Compression
Traditional compression is lossy — if you guess wrong about what's important, data is lost forever. This creates a difficult tradeoff:
- **Aggressive compression**: Risk losing data the LLM needs
- **Conservative compression**: Miss out on token savings
CCR eliminates this tradeoff.
## CCR-Enabled Components
| Component | What it compresses | CCR integration |
|-----------|-------------------|-----------------|
| **SmartCrusher** | JSON arrays (tool outputs) | Stores original array, marker includes hash |
| **ContentRouter** | Code, logs, search results, text | Stores original content by strategy |
## How CCR Works
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TOOL OUTPUT (1000 items) │
│ └─ SmartCrusher compresses to 20 items │
│ └─ Original cached with hash=abc123 │
│ └─ Retrieval tool injected into context │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ LLM PROCESSING │
│ Option A: LLM solves task with 20 items → Done (90% savings) │
│ Option B: LLM calls headroom_retrieve(hash=abc123) │
│ → Response Handler executes retrieval automatically │
│ → LLM receives full data, responds accurately │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
### Phase 1: Compression Store
When SmartCrusher compresses tool output:
1. Original content is stored in an LRU cache
2. A hash key is generated for retrieval
3. A marker is added to the compressed output: `[1000 items compressed to 20. Retrieve more: hash=abc123]`
### Phase 2: Tool Injection
Headroom injects a `headroom_retrieve` tool into the LLM's available tools:
```json
{
"name": "headroom_retrieve",
"description": "Retrieve original uncompressed data from Headroom cache",
"parameters": {
"hash": "The hash key from the compression marker"
}
}
```
### Phase 3: Response Handler
When the LLM calls `headroom_retrieve`:
1. Response Handler intercepts the tool call
2. Retrieves data from the local cache (~1ms)
3. Adds the result to the conversation
4. Continues the API call automatically
**The client never sees CCR tool calls** — they're handled transparently.
### Phase 4: Context Tracker
Across multiple turns, the Context Tracker:
1. Remembers what was compressed in earlier turns
2. Analyzes new queries for relevance to compressed content
3. Proactively expands relevant data before the LLM asks
**Example:**
```
Turn 1: User searches for files
→ Tool returns 500 files
→ SmartCrusher compresses to 15, caches original (hash=abc123)
→ LLM sees 15 files, answers question
Turn 5: User asks "What about the auth middleware?"
→ Context Tracker detects "auth" might be in abc123
→ Proactively expands compressed content
→ LLM sees full file list, finds auth_middleware.py
```
## CCR Stores Content Blocks, Not Dropped Messages
Headroom never drops whole messages from conversation history. CCR is purely about compressed **content blocks** — the newest tool outputs, tool results, and user content that the live-zone pipeline compresses. The original block is stored in the cache and is retrievable on demand:
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ LATEST TOOL RESULT (500 files, 12K tokens) │
│ └─ ContentRouter / SmartCrusher compresses the block │
│ └─ Original cached with hash=def456 │
│ └─ Marker inserted: "500 items compressed, retrieve: def456" │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ LLM PROCESSING │
│ Option A: LLM solves task with the compressed block → Done │
│ Option B: LLM needs the full content │
│ → Calls headroom_retrieve(hash=def456) │
│ → Full original block restored │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
The older conversation turns, system prompt, and tool definitions — the provider cache hot zone — are never mutated, so prompt caching keeps working. Compression happens only on the live zone (the newest content blocks) and is fully reversible via CCR.
**TOIN integration:** When users retrieve compressed content, TOIN learns to treat those patterns as higher value next time, improving future compression decisions across all users.
## Features
| Feature | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| **Automatic Response Handling** | When LLM calls `headroom_retrieve`, the proxy handles it automatically |
| **Multi-Turn Context Tracking** | Tracks compressed content across turns, proactively expands when relevant |
| **Hash-Keyed Retrieval** | `headroom_retrieve(hash)` always returns the full original content |
| **Feedback Learning** | Learns from retrieval patterns to improve future compression |
## Configuration
```bash
# Proxy with CCR enabled (default)
headroom proxy --port 8787
# Disable CCR response handling
headroom proxy --no-ccr-responses
# Disable proactive expansion
headroom proxy --no-ccr-expansion
```
## Why This Matters
| Approach | Risk | Savings |
|----------|------|---------|
| No compression | None | 0% |
| Traditional compression | Data loss | 70-90% |
| CCR compression | None (reversible) | 70-90% |
CCR gives you the savings of aggressive compression with zero risk — the LLM can always retrieve the original data if needed.
## Demo
Run the CCR demonstration to see it in action:
```bash
python examples/ccr_demo.py
```
Output:
```
1. COMPRESSION STORE
Original: 100 items (7,059 chars)
Compressed: 8 items (633 chars)
Reduction: 91.0%
3. RESPONSE HANDLER
Detected CCR tool call: True
Retrieved 100 items automatically
4. CONTEXT TRACKER
Turn 5: User asks "show authentication middleware"
Tracker found 1 relevant context
→ relevance=0.73
Proactively expanded: 100 items
```
## Architecture
For implementation details, see [ARCHITECTURE.md](ARCHITECTURE.md#ccr-compress-cache-retrieve).