headroom/.github/copilot-instructions.md
Copilot 96a7d7cbbe
Fix CI lint failure by formatting PR governance scripts (#933)
`CI / lint (pull_request)` failed because `ruff format --check` detected
formatting drift in the new PR governance script and its tests. This PR
aligns those files with repository formatting rules so the lint job can
pass.

- **Root cause**
  - `ruff format --check .` reported two files as non-canonical:
    - `scripts/pr-governance.py`
    - `scripts/tests/test_pr_governance.py`

- **Change set**
  - Applied `ruff` formatting to only the two flagged files.
- No behavioral or logic changes; edits are line-wrap/format
normalization only.

- **Representative update**
  ```python
  parser.add_argument(
"--event", type=Path, required=True, help="Path to the GitHub event
payload JSON."
  )
  ```

---------

Co-authored-by: JerrettDavis <mxjerrett@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-12 17:11:39 -05:00

697 B

When performing a pull request review in this repository:

  1. Treat .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md and CONTRIBUTING.md as required policy, not optional guidance.
  2. Flag pull requests that do not include concrete "Real Behavior Proof" with environment, exact commands or steps, observed result, and what was not tested.
  3. Be strict about contributor verification: missing tests, missing runtime evidence, or placeholder PR text should be called out.
  4. For user-facing, release, dependency, workflow, or security-sensitive changes, prefer blocking feedback over optional suggestions.
  5. Focus on correctness, safety, and whether the PR is actually ready for human maintainer review.