ham-ref/chirp
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp synced 2026-08-13 17:51:36 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
chirp/tests/Python3_Driver_Testing.md

480 lines
50 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

Add some stats to the testing report So we can see how much is completed vs. remaining.
2022-10-23 23:00:13 -07:00
## Status
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| Driver | Tester | Tested | Byte Clean | "Market Share" |
| ------ | ------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="ARRL_Travel_Plus"></a> ARRL_Travel_Plus | | | | 0.00% |
Fixes and testing: Abree AR-518 & update Python3 Driver Testing Matrix
2022-12-16 21:28:18 -05:00
| <a name="Abbree_AR-518"></a> Abbree_AR-518 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 16-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.24% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Abbree_AR-63"></a> Abbree_AR-63 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
ga510.py: Add Abbree AR-F5 - fixes #9575
2023-08-09 18:28:31 -04:00
| <a name="Abbree_AR-F5"></a> Abbree_AR-F5 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 09-Aug-2023 | Yes | |
Python 3 support for Alinco DJ-G7 This PR introduces the following changes: - The base class of the Alinco driver is modified to hopefully work with Python 3; the str-based approach is kept. - The AlincoDJG7EG class is further modified to be byte-clean. This required a bunch of overries that can be moved to the base class once the other drivers become byte-clean. A possible strategy for this is documented in the PR thread on github. - The changes for the DJ-G7 were tested with a real radio; the code submitted passes all unit tests. - Modification of `py3_driver_testers.txt` and re-running `tox` for an updated .md file. - A small bug in the debug log is also fixed (payload was not printed).
2022-12-09 19:06:51 +01:00
| <a name="Alinco_DJ-G7EG"></a> Alinco_DJ-G7EG | [@HB9UF](https://github.com/HB9UF) | 09-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.44% |
Mark Alinco DJ-G7T as working in py3 Fixes #10567
2023-05-09 15:38:35 -07:00
| <a name="Alinco_DJ-G7T"></a> Alinco_DJ-G7T | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10567) | 09-May-2023 | Yes | |
Convert the rest of the alinco radios to py3 This uses the alinco simulator to make the determination that they are working, not real radios. But, confidence is pretty high.
2022-12-12 08:17:09 -08:00
| <a name="Alinco_DJ175"></a> Alinco_DJ175 | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Alinco_DJ596"></a> Alinco_DJ596 | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR03T"></a> Alinco_DR03T | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR06T"></a> Alinco_DR06T | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR135T"></a> Alinco_DR135T | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR235T"></a> Alinco_DR235T | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Alinco_DR435T"></a> Alinco_DR435T | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fix AnyTone 5888UV and friends for py3
2022-12-09 18:54:16 -08:00
| <a name="AnyTone_5888UV"></a> AnyTone_5888UV | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.14% |
AnyTone 5888UVIII Python 3 updates, tested with radio, added to cpep8 manifest
2023-01-10 00:15:57 -07:00
| <a name="AnyTone_5888UVIII"></a> AnyTone_5888UVIII | [@bschuler42](https://github.com/bschuler42) | 9-Jan-2023 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="AnyTone_778UV"></a> AnyTone_778UV | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.17% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="AnyTone_778UV_VOX"></a> AnyTone_778UV_VOX | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.23% |
Fixes and testing: anytone_ht.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-17 22:12:13 -05:00
| <a name="AnyTone_OBLTR-8R"></a> AnyTone_OBLTR-8R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="AnyTone_TERMN-8R"></a> AnyTone_TERMN-8R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add py3 test matrix entries for new ga510 models This was missed in the patch to add these models.
2023-03-18 09:46:52 -07:00
| <a name="Anysecu_AC-580"></a> Anysecu_AC-580 | [Implied by Radioddity_GS-5B](#user-content-Radioddity_GS-5B) | 17-Mar-2023 | Yes | |
Add Anysecu UV-A37 - fixes #10376
2023-06-05 21:26:02 -04:00
| <a name="Anysecu_UV-A37"></a> Anysecu_UV-A37 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 5-Jun-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Anysecu_WP-9900"></a> Anysecu_WP-9900 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="BTECH_FRS-A1"></a> BTECH_FRS-A1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="BTECH_FRS-B1"></a> BTECH_FRS-B1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="BTECH_GMRS-20V2"></a> BTECH_GMRS-20V2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Add BTech GMRS-50V2 - fixes #10374
2023-02-14 22:46:20 -05:00
| <a name="BTECH_GMRS-50V2"></a> BTECH_GMRS-50V2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 15-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_GMRS-50X1"></a> BTECH_GMRS-50X1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.13% |
Update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-10 21:09:16 -05:00
| <a name="BTECH_GMRS-V1"></a> BTECH_GMRS-V1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.16% |
| <a name="BTECH_GMRS-V2"></a> BTECH_GMRS-V2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.16% |
| <a name="BTECH_MURS-V1"></a> BTECH_MURS-V1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add BTECH MURS-V2 - fixes #10409
2023-02-11 13:53:28 -05:00
| <a name="BTECH_MURS-V2"></a> BTECH_MURS-V2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 2-Mar-2023 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-2501"></a> BTECH_UV-2501 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="BTECH_UV-2501+220"></a> BTECH_UV-2501+220 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="BTECH_UV-25X2"></a> BTECH_UV-25X2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.15% |
Add BTECH UV-25X2_G2 - fixes #10542
2023-04-23 16:18:00 -04:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-25X2_G2"></a> BTECH_UV-25X2_G2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 23-Apr-2023 | Yes | |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-25X4"></a> BTECH_UV-25X4 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.11% |
Add BTECH UV-25X4_G2 - fixes #10543
2023-04-23 17:12:59 -04:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-25X4_G2"></a> BTECH_UV-25X4_G2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 23-Apr-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-5001"></a> BTECH_UV-5001 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="BTECH_UV-50X2"></a> BTECH_UV-50X2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.13% |
| <a name="BTECH_UV-50X2_G2"></a> BTECH_UV-50X2_G2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-10 21:09:16 -05:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-50X3"></a> BTECH_UV-50X3 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.06% |
Fixes and testing: uv5x3.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-09 19:06:32 -08:00
| <a name="BTECH_UV-5X3"></a> BTECH_UV-5X3 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.43% |
Add subclasses for BF1901 and BF1904 Fixes: #8551 ``` python3 -mpip install tox tox -e unit tox -e makesupported tox -e style ```
2023-07-04 11:39:30 -06:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-1901"></a> Baofeng_BF-1901 | [@cetinajero](https://github.com/cetinajero) | 3-Jul-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-1904"></a> Baofeng_BF-1904 | [@cetinajero](https://github.com/cetinajero) | 3-Jul-2023 | Yes | |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-888"></a> Baofeng_BF-888 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 13-Feb-2019 | Yes | **15.53%** |
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-A58"></a> Baofeng_BF-A58 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | **1.46%** |
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-A58S"></a> Baofeng_BF-A58S | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.59% |
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-F8HP"></a> Baofeng_BF-F8HP | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | **6.33%** |
Add Baofeng BF-M4 I have tested the Baofeng BF-M4 and its based on 888s except it has no FM functionality. This PR fixes https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/7215
2023-05-08 19:22:34 -06:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-M4"></a> Baofeng_BF-M4 | [@cetinajero](https://github.com/cetinajero) | 8-May-2023 | Yes | |
Update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-10 21:09:16 -05:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-T1"></a> Baofeng_BF-T1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.76% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-T8"></a> Baofeng_BF-T8 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.42% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_BF-V8A"></a> Baofeng_BF-V8A | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Baofeng_F-11"></a> Baofeng_F-11 | [Implied by Baofeng_UV-5R](#user-content-Baofeng_UV-5R) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.12% |
| <a name="Baofeng_GT-3WP"></a> Baofeng_GT-3WP | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.43% |
| <a name="Baofeng_GT-5R"></a> Baofeng_GT-5R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.68% |
Re-fix UV3R for python 3 This was working, but wasn't byte clean. After converting the wouxun_common module, this stopped working because it wasn't on the same page. Fixes #10257
2023-01-11 14:39:18 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-3R"></a> Baofeng_UV-3R | [@yarda](https://github.com/yarda) | 26-Sep-2022 | Yes | 0.45% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-5R"></a> Baofeng_UV-5R | [@lekv](https://github.com/lekv) | 23-Oct-2022 | Yes | **28.81%** |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-6"></a> Baofeng_UV-6 | [Implied by Baofeng_UV-5R](#user-content-Baofeng_UV-5R) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.46% |
Update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-10 21:09:16 -05:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-6R"></a> Baofeng_UV-6R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.71% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-82"></a> Baofeng_UV-82 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | **8.78%** |
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-82HP"></a> Baofeng_UV-82HP | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | **2.38%** |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-82WP"></a> Baofeng_UV-82WP | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.32% |
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-9G"></a> Baofeng_UV-9G | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.65% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-9R"></a> Baofeng_UV-9R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | **2.52%** |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baofeng_UV-B5"></a> Baofeng_UV-B5 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.35% |
Add Baojie BJ-218 to Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2023-02-16 19:33:16 -05:00
| <a name="Baojie_BJ-218"></a> Baojie_BJ-218 | [Implied by LUITON_LT-725UV](#user-content-LUITON_LT-725UV) | 16-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.29% |
Bajoie BJ-318: Settings panel error This patch addresses the error generated when the Settings tab is accessed. Related to #10210
2023-01-02 13:02:18 -05:00
| <a name="Baojie_BJ-318"></a> Baojie_BJ-318 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 2-Jan-2023 | Yes | 0.10% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Baojie_BJ-9900"></a> Baojie_BJ-9900 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Baojie_BJ-UV55"></a> Baojie_BJ-UV55 | | | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Boblov_X3Plus"></a> Boblov_X3Plus | | | | 0.02% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="CRT_Micron_UV"></a> CRT_Micron_UV | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
| <a name="CRT_Micron_UV_V2"></a> CRT_Micron_UV_V2 | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.10% |
Rename Signus to Cignus for XTR-5 This was added under the wrong vendor name in 18295675. A compat mapping entry is added to avoid breaking existing images. Related to #7997
2023-03-19 09:14:50 -07:00
| <a name="Cignus_XTR-5"></a> Cignus_XTR-5 | [Implied by Radioddity_GS-5B](#user-content-Radioddity_GS-5B) | 17-Mar-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Commander_KG-UV"></a> Commander_KG-UV | | | | 0.00% |
| <a name="Explorer_QRZ-1"></a> Explorer_QRZ-1 | [Implied by TYT_TH-UV88](#user-content-TYT_TH-UV88) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-150A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-150A | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-160A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-160A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-268A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-268A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-268B"></a> Feidaxin_FD-268B | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-288A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-288A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-288B"></a> Feidaxin_FD-288B | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-450A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-450A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-460A"></a> Feidaxin_FD-460A | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Feidaxin_FD-460UH"></a> Feidaxin_FD-460UH | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Generic_CSV"></a> Generic_CSV | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 4-Dec-2022 | | |
Add support for Hiroyasu HI-8811 - fixes #10622
2023-06-04 22:14:50 -04:00
| <a name="Hiroyasu_HI-8811"></a> Hiroyasu_HI-8811 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 4-Jun-2023 | Yes | |
Fix HobbyPCB RS-UV3 for python 3
2022-12-09 17:21:36 -08:00
| <a name="HobbyPCB_RS-UV3"></a> HobbyPCB_RS-UV3 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-208H"></a> Icom_IC-208H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-2100H"></a> Icom_IC-2100H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-2200H"></a> Icom_IC-2200H | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Record IC-2300 and FT-65R as working Fixes #10264 Fixes #10266
2023-01-13 12:23:04 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-2300H"></a> Icom_IC-2300H | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10264) | 13-Jan-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-2720H"></a> Icom_IC-2720H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Record IC2730 as working in the wild Fixes #10261
2023-01-12 15:32:32 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-2730A"></a> Icom_IC-2730A | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10261) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.21% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-2820H"></a> Icom_IC-2820H | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Mark Icom IC-7000 as tested/working on python3 As noted while testing #10510
2023-04-10 14:54:44 -07:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-7000"></a> Icom_IC-7000 | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10510) | 10-Apr-2023 | Yes | 0.03% |
Add IC-7100 as reported working
2023-02-16 14:39:13 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-7100"></a> Icom_IC-7100 | Mike W | 16-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.06% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-7200"></a> Icom_IC-7200 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | |
| <a name="Icom_IC-7300"></a> Icom_IC-7300 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Mark IC-746 as tested Also fix some 2022->2023 errors I've made lately. Fixes #10346
2023-02-03 15:45:16 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-746"></a> Icom_IC-746 | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10346) | 3-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-7610"></a> Icom_IC-7610 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-910"></a> Icom_IC-910 | [@mfncooper](https://github.com/mfncooper) | 1-Oct-2021 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-91_92AD"></a> Icom_IC-91_92AD | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 23-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-E90"></a> Icom_IC-E90 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Icom_IC-P7"></a> Icom_IC-P7 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-Q7A"></a> Icom_IC-Q7A | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 20-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-T70"></a> Icom_IC-T70 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Mark three radios as tested in -next Icom T7H Yaesu FT-8900 TYT TH-9800 Fixes #10755 Fixes #10752 Fixes #10747
2023-07-30 10:39:49 -07:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-T7H"></a> Icom_IC-T7H | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10752) | 30-Jul-2023 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-T8A"></a> Icom_IC-T8A | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Fix icx8x driver upload Probably due to many refactors of ICF over the years, this driver lost the double-ident behavior of the factory software, which seems critical to make the radio actually go into clone mode. This adds a flag so we can do it when necessary. This and the patches behind it probably resolve #6637
2023-01-25 17:13:54 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-U82"></a> Icom_IC-U82 | [Implied by Icom_IC-V82](#user-content-Icom_IC-V82) | 25-Jan-2023 | Yes | |
Add IC-V80 clone ranges and endframe This comes from testing with an actual radio. Fixes #174
2023-02-15 23:13:23 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-V80"></a> Icom_IC-V80 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 16-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix icx8x driver upload Probably due to many refactors of ICF over the years, this driver lost the double-ident behavior of the factory software, which seems critical to make the radio actually go into clone mode. This adds a flag so we can do it when necessary. This and the patches behind it probably resolve #6637
2023-01-25 17:13:54 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-V82"></a> Icom_IC-V82 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 25-Jan-2023 | Yes | |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-V86"></a> Icom_IC-V86 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Record Icom W32A as working Reported by a user. Fixes #10238
2023-01-08 08:44:16 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-W32A"></a> Icom_IC-W32A | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10238) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_IC-W32E"></a> Icom_IC-W32E | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-31A"></a> Icom_ID-31A | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 1-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Updated ID-4100, testing by me
2022-12-18 11:57:27 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-4100"></a> Icom_ID-4100 | [@n8sqt](https://github.com/n8sqt) | 18-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-51"></a> Icom_ID-51 | [Implied by Icom_ID-31A](#user-content-Icom_ID-31A) | 1-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Update a couple of radios in the matrix The 2730 should be good now that I've done more testing on the 5100. Update the 5100 date after the recent fix, and mark the 4100 as implied from the 5100 instead of tested directly.
2022-12-17 09:40:41 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-5100"></a> Icom_ID-5100 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-51_Plus"></a> Icom_ID-51_Plus | [Implied by Icom_ID-31A](#user-content-Icom_ID-31A) | 1-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Mark ID-51 Plus 2 as implied This is basically the same as the ID-31, but uses new raw mode cloning like the 5100, 2730, etc.
2022-12-17 12:21:45 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-51_Plus2"></a> Icom_ID-51_Plus2 | [Implied by Icom_ID-31A](#user-content-Icom_ID-31A) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-800H_v2"></a> Icom_ID-800H_v2 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-80H"></a> Icom_ID-80H | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/icf.py) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Icom_ID-880H"></a> Icom_ID-880H | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fix AnyTone 5888UV and friends for py3
2022-12-09 18:54:16 -08:00
| <a name="Intek_HR-2040"></a> Intek_HR-2040 | [Implied by AnyTone_5888UV](#user-content-AnyTone_5888UV) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Intek_KT-980HP"></a> Intek_KT-980HP | [Implied by Baofeng_BF-F8HP](#user-content-Baofeng_BF-F8HP) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Convert the rest of the alinco radios to py3 This uses the alinco simulator to make the determination that they are working, not real radios. But, confidence is pretty high.
2022-12-12 08:17:09 -08:00
| <a name="Jetstream_JT220M"></a> Jetstream_JT220M | [Implied by Alinco_DR235T](#user-content-Alinco_DR235T) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add Jetstream JT270MH and friends to py3 club
2022-12-13 12:56:45 -08:00
| <a name="Jetstream_JT270M"></a> Jetstream_JT270M | [Implied by Jetstream_JT270M](#user-content-Jetstream_JT270M) | 13-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Jetstream_JT270MH"></a> Jetstream_JT270MH | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 13-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="KYD_IP-620"></a> KYD_IP-620 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="KYD_NC-630A"></a> KYD_NC-630A | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_HMK"></a> Kenwood_HMK | [Implied by Generic_CSV](#user-content-Generic_CSV) | 4-Dec-2022 | | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_ITM"></a> Kenwood_ITM | | | | 0.00% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D7"></a> Kenwood_TH-D7 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D72_clone_mode"></a> Kenwood_TH-D72_clone_mode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D72_live_mode"></a> Kenwood_TH-D72_live_mode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 21-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D74_clone_mode"></a> Kenwood_TH-D74_clone_mode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D74_live_mode"></a> Kenwood_TH-D74_live_mode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 20-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-D7G"></a> Kenwood_TH-D7G | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-F6"></a> Kenwood_TH-F6 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-F7"></a> Kenwood_TH-F7 | [@sv1](https://github.com/sv1) | 19-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-G71"></a> Kenwood_TH-G71 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TH-K2"></a> Kenwood_TH-K2 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Mark IC-746 as tested Also fix some 2022->2023 errors I've made lately. Fixes #10346
2023-02-03 15:45:16 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-2140K"></a> Kenwood_TK-2140K | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-3140K](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-3140K) | 2-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-2180"></a> Kenwood_TK-2180 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-260"></a> Kenwood_TK-260 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-260G"></a> Kenwood_TK-260G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-270"></a> Kenwood_TK-270 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-270G"></a> Kenwood_TK-270G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-272"></a> Kenwood_TK-272 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-272G"></a> Kenwood_TK-272G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-278"></a> Kenwood_TK-278 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-278G"></a> Kenwood_TK-278G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Mark IC-746 as tested Also fix some 2022->2023 errors I've made lately. Fixes #10346
2023-02-03 15:45:16 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-3140K"></a> Kenwood_TK-3140K | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 2-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-3140K2"></a> Kenwood_TK-3140K2 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-3140K](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-3140K) | 2-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-3140K3"></a> Kenwood_TK-3140K3 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-3140K](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-3140K) | 2-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-3180K"></a> Kenwood_TK-3180K | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-3180K2"></a> Kenwood_TK-3180K2 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-3180K](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-3180K) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-360"></a> Kenwood_TK-360 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-360G"></a> Kenwood_TK-360G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-370"></a> Kenwood_TK-370 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-370G"></a> Kenwood_TK-370G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-372"></a> Kenwood_TK-372 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-372G"></a> Kenwood_TK-372G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-378"></a> Kenwood_TK-378 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-378G"></a> Kenwood_TK-378G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-388G"></a> Kenwood_TK-388G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7102"></a> Kenwood_TK-7102 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7108"></a> Kenwood_TK-7108 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add Kenwood TK-7160, 8160 support This is not very complete yet, but it works for me. Tested with a real 7160 and with 8160 files from KPG-99D. Fixes #10323
2023-01-24 14:51:54 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7160K"></a> Kenwood_TK-7160K | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 27-Jan-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7160M"></a> Kenwood_TK-7160M | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-7160K](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-7160K) | 27-Jan-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7180"></a> Kenwood_TK-7180 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 18-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-7180E"></a> Kenwood_TK-7180E | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-7180](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-7180) | 18-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-760"></a> Kenwood_TK-760 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-760G"></a> Kenwood_TK-760G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-762"></a> Kenwood_TK-762 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-762G"></a> Kenwood_TK-762G | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-768"></a> Kenwood_TK-768 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-768G"></a> Kenwood_TK-768G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8102"></a> Kenwood_TK-8102 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8108"></a> Kenwood_TK-8108 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add Kenwood TK-7160, 8160 support This is not very complete yet, but it works for me. Tested with a real 7160 and with 8160 files from KPG-99D. Fixes #10323
2023-01-24 14:51:54 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8160K"></a> Kenwood_TK-8160K | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-7160K](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-7160K) | 27-Jan-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8160M"></a> Kenwood_TK-8160M | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-7160K](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-7160K) | 27-Jan-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8180"></a> Kenwood_TK-8180 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 18-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-8180E"></a> Kenwood_TK-8180E | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-8180](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-8180) | 18-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-860"></a> Kenwood_TK-860 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-860G"></a> Kenwood_TK-860G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-862"></a> Kenwood_TK-862 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-862G"></a> Kenwood_TK-862G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-868"></a> Kenwood_TK-868 | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-760](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-760) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TK-868G"></a> Kenwood_TK-868G | [Implied by Kenwood_TK-762G](#user-content-Kenwood_TK-762G) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-271"></a> Kenwood_TM-271 | [Implied by Kenwood_TM-281](#user-content-Kenwood_TM-281) | 23-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-281"></a> Kenwood_TM-281 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 23-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-471"></a> Kenwood_TM-471 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D700"></a> Kenwood_TM-D700 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 20-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D710"></a> Kenwood_TM-D710 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D710G"></a> Kenwood_TM-D710G | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D710G_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TM-D710G_CloneMode | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 22-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-D710_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TM-D710_CloneMode | | | Yes | 0.00% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-G707"></a> Kenwood_TM-G707 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-V7"></a> Kenwood_TM-V7 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/kenwood_live.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TM-V71"></a> Kenwood_TM-V71 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 21-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Mark TS-2000 as tested in py3 by ZS6CRW As noted on #10248
2023-01-09 18:09:45 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-2000"></a> Kenwood_TS-2000 | ZS6CRW | 10-Jan-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-480_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-480_CloneMode | | | | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-480_LiveMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-480_LiveMode | | | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-590SG_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-590SG_CloneMode | | | | 0.00% |
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-590S_CloneMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-590S_CloneMode | | | | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-590S_SG_LiveMode"></a> Kenwood_TS-590S_SG_LiveMode | | | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Kenwood_TS-850"></a> Kenwood_TS-850 | | | Yes | 0.00% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="LUITON_LT-316"></a> LUITON_LT-316 | [Implied by Retevis_RT22](#user-content-Retevis_RT22) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="LUITON_LT-580_UHF"></a> LUITON_LT-580_UHF | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="LUITON_LT-580_VHF"></a> LUITON_LT-580_VHF | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="LUITON_LT-588UV"></a> LUITON_LT-588UV | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Fixes and testing: LT-725UV & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-11 17:40:44 -05:00
| <a name="LUITON_LT-725UV"></a> LUITON_LT-725UV | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Lanchonlh_HG-UV98"></a> Lanchonlh_HG-UV98 | | | Yes | 0.00% |
Add Jetstream JT270MH and friends to py3 club
2022-12-13 12:56:45 -08:00
| <a name="Leixen_VV-898"></a> Leixen_VV-898 | [Implied by Jetstream_JT270MH](#user-content-Jetstream_JT270MH) | 13-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.18% |
Mark Leixen VV-898S as tested in the py3 test matrix
2022-12-19 20:45:26 -05:00
| <a name="Leixen_VV-898S"></a> Leixen_VV-898S | [@READ10](https://github.com/READ10) | 19-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.10% |
Fixes and testing: uv5x3.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-09 19:06:32 -08:00
| <a name="MTC_UV-5R-3"></a> MTC_UV-5R-3 | [Implied by BTECH_UV-5X3](#user-content-BTECH_UV-5X3) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add Maverick RA-100 & RA-425 radios
2023-07-07 11:42:31 -06:00
| <a name="Maverick_RA-100"></a> Maverick_RA-100 | [@cetinajero](https://github.com/cetinajero) | 7-Jul-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="Maverick_RA-425"></a> Maverick_RA-425 | [@cetinajero](https://github.com/cetinajero) | 7-Jul-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Midland_DBR2500"></a> Midland_DBR2500 | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Fix AnyTone 5888UV and friends for py3
2022-12-09 18:54:16 -08:00
| <a name="Polmar_DB-50M"></a> Polmar_DB-50M | [Implied by AnyTone_5888UV](#user-content-AnyTone_5888UV) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Powerwerx_DB-750X"></a> Powerwerx_DB-750X | [Implied by AnyTone_5888UV](#user-content-AnyTone_5888UV) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Puxing_PX-2R"></a> Puxing_PX-2R | | | | 0.05% |
Probably fix some wouxun_common radios These radios largely use the wouxun_common routines for cloning and thus are probably fixed by making sure they send byte strings for the commands. I haven't written tests for these, but this will increase the likelihood someone will be able to report them as "just works."
2022-12-24 14:18:59 -08:00
| <a name="Puxing_PX-777"></a> Puxing_PX-777 | | | Yes | 0.11% |
Fix px888k for python3 Fixes #10544
2023-05-04 16:12:47 -07:00
| <a name="Puxing_PX-888K"></a> Puxing_PX-888K | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10544) | 09-May-2023 | Yes | 0.07% |
Add Q-MAC HF-90 py3 test matrix entry I forgot to make sure this got added. Related to #10428
2023-03-10 20:25:42 -08:00
| <a name="Q-MAC_HF-90_v300_or_earlier"></a> Q-MAC_HF-90_v300_or_earlier | [@fthain](https://github.com/fthain) | 9-Mar-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="Q-MAC_HF-90_v301_or_later"></a> Q-MAC_HF-90_v301_or_later | [@fthain](https://github.com/fthain) | 9-Mar-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="QYT_KT-8R"></a> QYT_KT-8R | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.09% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="QYT_KT-UV980"></a> QYT_KT-UV980 | [Implied by WACCOM_MINI-8900](#user-content-WACCOM_MINI-8900) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="QYT_KT-WP12"></a> QYT_KT-WP12 | [Implied by Anysecu_WP-9900](#user-content-Anysecu_WP-9900) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="QYT_KT5800"></a> QYT_KT5800 | [Implied by BTECH_UV-25X2](#user-content-BTECH_UV-25X2) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="QYT_KT7900D"></a> QYT_KT7900D | [Implied by BTECH_UV-25X4](#user-content-BTECH_UV-25X4) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.37% |
| <a name="QYT_KT8900"></a> QYT_KT8900 | [Implied by LUITON_LT-588UV](#user-content-LUITON_LT-588UV) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.42% |
| <a name="QYT_KT8900D"></a> QYT_KT8900D | [Implied by BTECH_UV-25X2](#user-content-BTECH_UV-25X2) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.52% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="QYT_KT8900R"></a> QYT_KT8900R | [Implied by BTECH_UV-2501+220](#user-content-BTECH_UV-2501+220) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.13% |
| <a name="QYT_KT980PLUS"></a> QYT_KT980PLUS | [Implied by BTECH_UV-25X2](#user-content-BTECH_UV-25X2) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.09% |
Fix Quansheng TG-UV2 for Python3 Fixes #10398
2023-02-26 17:46:53 -08:00
| <a name="Quansheng_TG-UV2+"></a> Quansheng_TG-UV2+ | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10398) | 26-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.05% |
Add Quansheng UV-K5 driver This work was all done by @sq5bpf and is exactly like the last commit authored by him, which was 4d902e0 in PR 667. I just squashed this, rebased, and fixed the conflicts (all in chirp/locale). Fixes #10478
2023-06-21 14:17:19 +02:00
| <a name="Quansheng_UV-K5"></a> Quansheng_UV-K5 | [@sq5bpf](https://github.com/sq5bpf) | 29-May-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="RT_Systems_CSV"></a> RT_Systems_CSV | | | | |
| <a name="Radioddity_DB25-G"></a> Radioddity_DB25-G | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.17% |
| <a name="Radioddity_GA-2S"></a> Radioddity_GA-2S | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.19% |
| <a name="Radioddity_GA-510"></a> Radioddity_GA-510 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 21-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.42% |
Add py3 test matrix entries for new ga510 models This was missed in the patch to add these models.
2023-03-18 09:46:52 -07:00
| <a name="Radioddity_GS-5B"></a> Radioddity_GS-5B | [@lunapiercook](https://github.com/lunapiercook) | 5-Mar-2023 | Yes | |
Update Retevis RT24
2022-12-22 17:06:42 -05:00
| <a name="Radioddity_R2"></a> Radioddity_R2 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Radioddity_UV-5G"></a> Radioddity_UV-5G | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.47% |
| <a name="Radioddity_UV-5RX3"></a> Radioddity_UV-5RX3 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.90% |
| <a name="Radioddity_UV-82X3"></a> Radioddity_UV-82X3 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Add Radtel RT-470 - fixes #10354
2023-03-21 13:12:48 -04:00
| <a name="Radtel_RT-470"></a> Radtel_RT-470 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 2-Apr-2023 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add Radtel RT-470L - fixes #10458
2023-04-28 13:34:57 -04:00
| <a name="Radtel_RT-470L"></a> Radtel_RT-470L | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 5-May-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Radtel_T18"></a> Radtel_T18 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.07% |
Add Retevis H777S
2022-12-22 10:55:22 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_H777S"></a> Retevis_H777S | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 22-Dec-2022 | Yes | |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_H777_Plus"></a> Retevis_H777_Plus | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.06% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RA685"></a> Retevis_RA685 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 19-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.25% |
| <a name="Retevis_RA85"></a> Retevis_RA85 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 19-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rb15.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-18 19:18:07 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB15"></a> Retevis_RB15 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB17"></a> Retevis_RB17 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB17A"></a> Retevis_RB17A | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Fixes and testing: Retevis RB17P & update Python Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-18 15:29:52 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB17P"></a> Retevis_RB17P | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB17V"></a> Retevis_RB17V | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB18"></a> Retevis_RB18 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB19"></a> Retevis_RB19 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB19P"></a> Retevis_RB19P | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB23"></a> Retevis_RB23 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB26"></a> Retevis_RB26 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB27"></a> Retevis_RB27 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.09% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB27B"></a> Retevis_RB27B | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB27V"></a> Retevis_RB27V | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add Retevis RB28 - fixes #10324
2023-02-09 18:02:41 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB28"></a> Retevis_RB28 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 9-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add Retevis RB28B - fixes #10324
2023-01-26 20:49:13 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB28B"></a> Retevis_RB28B | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 27-Jan-2023 | Yes | |
Add Retevis RB29
2022-12-24 22:04:17 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB29"></a> Retevis_RB29 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 24-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rb15.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-18 19:18:07 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB615"></a> Retevis_RB615 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB617"></a> Retevis_RB617 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB618"></a> Retevis_RB618 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.16% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB619"></a> Retevis_RB619 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB627B"></a> Retevis_RB627B | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Add Retevis RB628 - fixes #10325
2023-02-10 12:52:04 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB628"></a> Retevis_RB628 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
Add Retevis RB628B - fixes #10325
2023-01-28 11:00:49 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB628B"></a> Retevis_RB628B | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Jan-2023 | Yes | |
Add Retevis RB629
2022-12-24 22:54:36 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB629"></a> Retevis_RB629 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 24-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB75"></a> Retevis_RB75 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RB85"></a> Retevis_RB85 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
radtel_t18.py: add Retevis RB87 - fixes #10435
2023-03-10 18:22:42 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RB87"></a> Retevis_RB87 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 10-Mar-2023 | Yes | |
Fixes and testing: Retevis RT1 & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-11 20:11:07 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT1"></a> Retevis_RT1 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
Add Retevis RT15 - fixes #6855
2023-02-18 17:32:47 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT15"></a> Retevis_RT15 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.00% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT16"></a> Retevis_RT16 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT19"></a> Retevis_RT19 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT21"></a> Retevis_RT21 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.20% |
retevis_rt21.py: Add Retevis RT21V - fixes #9579
2023-07-24 21:09:19 -04:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT21V"></a> Retevis_RT21V | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 24-Jul-2023 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT22"></a> Retevis_RT22 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.53% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT22FRS"></a> Retevis_RT22FRS | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT22S"></a> Retevis_RT22S | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Fixes and testing: RT23 & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-17 16:53:45 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT23"></a> Retevis_RT23 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Update Retevis RT24
2022-12-22 17:06:42 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT24"></a> Retevis_RT24 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 22-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.31% |
Fixes and testing: RT26 & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-17 20:27:10 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT26"></a> Retevis_RT26 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT29_UHF"></a> Retevis_RT29_UHF | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT29_VHF"></a> Retevis_RT29_VHF | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT40B"></a> Retevis_RT40B | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT47"></a> Retevis_RT47 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT47V"></a> Retevis_RT47V | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT6"></a> Retevis_RT6 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 3-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT619"></a> Retevis_RT619 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT622"></a> Retevis_RT622 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.09% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT647"></a> Retevis_RT647 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT668"></a> Retevis_RT668 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT68"></a> Retevis_RT68 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 28-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT76"></a> Retevis_RT76 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 30-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fixes and testing: RT76P & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-17 17:47:08 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT76P"></a> Retevis_RT76P | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT85"></a> Retevis_RT85 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.22% |
Add Retevis RT86 - fixes #10377
2023-02-17 20:36:49 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT86"></a> Retevis_RT86 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 17-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
Fixes and testing: RT87 & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-17 20:56:39 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT87"></a> Retevis_RT87 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 17-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT9000D_136-174"></a> Retevis_RT9000D_136-174 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT9000D_220-260"></a> Retevis_RT9000D_220-260 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT9000D_400-490"></a> Retevis_RT9000D_400-490 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT9000D_66-88"></a> Retevis_RT9000D_66-88 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.00% |
| <a name="Retevis_RT95"></a> Retevis_RT95 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT95_VOX"></a> Retevis_RT95_VOX | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.15% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt98.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-12 13:38:10 -05:00
| <a name="Retevis_RT98"></a> Retevis_RT98 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 14-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Rugged_RH5R-V2"></a> Rugged_RH5R-V2 | | | | 0.05% |
Add Ruyage UV58Plus - fixes #10334
2023-03-03 13:23:35 -05:00
| <a name="Ruyage_UV58Plus"></a> Ruyage_UV58Plus | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Mar-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Sainsonic_AP510"></a> Sainsonic_AP510 | | | | 0.00% |
Add py3 test matrix entries for new ga510 models This was missed in the patch to add these models.
2023-03-18 09:46:52 -07:00
| <a name="SenhaiX_8800"></a> SenhaiX_8800 | [Implied by Radioddity_GS-5B](#user-content-Radioddity_GS-5B) | 17-Mar-2023 | Yes | |
Add TDXone TD-Q8A test report
2022-12-18 10:30:37 -08:00
| <a name="TDXone_TD-Q8A"></a> TDXone_TD-Q8A | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 18-Dec-2022 | | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="TIDRADIO_TD-H6"></a> TIDRADIO_TD-H6 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 21-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.43% |
New driver UV68 and TDH8 Fixes #10059
2023-01-13 15:21:43 +08:00
| <a name="TIDRADIO_TD-H8"></a> TIDRADIO_TD-H8 | [@Sandmann34](https://github.com/Sandmann34) | 7-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="TIDRADIO_TD-H8-GMRS"></a> TIDRADIO_TD-H8-GMRS | [@Sandmann34](https://github.com/Sandmann34) | 7-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="TIDRADIO_TD-H8-HAM"></a> TIDRADIO_TD-H8-HAM | [@Sandmann34](https://github.com/Sandmann34) | 7-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="TID_TD-M8"></a> TID_TD-M8 | [Implied by Retevis_RT22](#user-content-Retevis_RT22) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
New driver UV68 and TDH8 Fixes #10059
2023-01-13 15:21:43 +08:00
| <a name="TID_TD-UV68"></a> TID_TD-UV68 | [@Sandmann34](https://github.com/Sandmann34) | 7-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-350"></a> TYT_TH-350 | | | Yes | 0.07% |
Fix th7800 for chirp-next Fixes #10585
2023-06-08 18:44:20 -07:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-7800"></a> TYT_TH-7800 | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10585) | 4-Jul-2023 | Yes | 0.13% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-7800_File"></a> TYT_TH-7800_File | | | | 0.00% |
Mark three radios as tested in -next Icom T7H Yaesu FT-8900 TYT TH-9800 Fixes #10755 Fixes #10752 Fixes #10747
2023-07-30 10:39:49 -07:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-9800"></a> TYT_TH-9800 | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10755) | 30-Jul-2023 | Yes | 0.65% |
Convert TYT TH9800 for python3 This has not been tested with a real radio, but the cloning routines are straightforward and a simple test is added to exercise them to confirm they do the right thing.
2022-12-24 10:31:50 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-9800_File"></a> TYT_TH-9800_File | | | Yes | 0.00% |
Probably fix some wouxun_common radios These radios largely use the wouxun_common routines for cloning and thus are probably fixed by making sure they send byte strings for the commands. I haven't written tests for these, but this will increase the likelihood someone will be able to report them as "just works."
2022-12-24 14:18:59 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-UV3R"></a> TYT_TH-UV3R | | | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="TYT_TH-UV3R-25"></a> TYT_TH-UV3R-25 | | | Yes | 0.02% |
Fix TYT TH-UV8000 This patch updates the th_uv8000.py driver for CHIRP-next (py3) compatibility. Fixes #10233
2023-01-06 16:38:22 -05:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-UV8000"></a> TYT_TH-UV8000 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 6-Jan-2023 | Yes | 0.31% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-UV88"></a> TYT_TH-UV88 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 5-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.51% |
Fix TYT TH-UV1F for py3
2022-12-13 13:18:14 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-UVF1"></a> TYT_TH-UVF1 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 13-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.06% |
Mark IC-746 as tested Also fix some 2022->2023 errors I've made lately. Fixes #10346
2023-02-03 15:45:16 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH-UVF8D"></a> TYT_TH-UVF8D | [@MELERIX](https://github.com/MELERIX) | 2-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.05% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="TYT_TH9000_144"></a> TYT_TH9000_144 | [Implied by Retevis_RT9000D_136-174](#user-content-Retevis_RT9000D_136-174) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.06% |
| <a name="TYT_TH9000_220"></a> TYT_TH9000_220 | [Implied by Retevis_RT9000D_220-260](#user-content-Retevis_RT9000D_220-260) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
| <a name="TYT_TH9000_440"></a> TYT_TH9000_440 | [Implied by Retevis_RT9000D_400-490](#user-content-Retevis_RT9000D_400-490) | 8-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add Talkpod A36plus - fixes #10559
2023-06-11 22:35:23 -04:00
| <a name="Talkpod_A36plus"></a> Talkpod_A36plus | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 12-Jun-2023 | Yes | |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_FTL-1011"></a> Vertex_Standard_FTL-1011 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_FTL-2011"></a> Vertex_Standard_FTL-2011 | | | | 0.05% |
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_FTL-7011"></a> Vertex_Standard_FTL-7011 | | | | 0.03% |
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_FTL-8011"></a> Vertex_Standard_FTL-8011 | | | | 0.01% |
| <a name="Vertex_Standard_VXA-700"></a> Vertex_Standard_VXA-700 | | | | 0.02% |
| <a name="WACCOM_MINI-8900"></a> WACCOM_MINI-8900 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.12% |
| <a name="WLN_KD-C1"></a> WLN_KD-C1 | [Implied by Retevis_RT22](#user-content-Retevis_RT22) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | **1.73%** |
New Model support Wouxun KG-UV980P, KG-1000G, KG-1000G Plus Fixes: #7223 Fixes: #10109 Fixes: #9979
2023-01-23 22:36:21 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-1000G"></a> Wouxun_KG-1000G | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 23-jan-2023 | Yes | |
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-1000G_Plus"></a> Wouxun_KG-1000G_Plus | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 23-jan-2023 | Yes | 0.00% |
Fixes and testing: wouxun.py, wouxun_common.py & update matrix
2022-12-11 14:44:24 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-816"></a> Wouxun_KG-816 | [Implied by Wouxun_KG-UV6](#user-content-Wouxun_KG-UV6) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.07% |
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-818"></a> Wouxun_KG-818 | [Implied by Wouxun_KG-UV6](#user-content-Wouxun_KG-UV6) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
Wouxun KG-935G Radio testing Confirm ability to Read/Write from/to radio. Changed memory locations and some settings values - all looked good.
2023-01-04 10:26:15 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-935G"></a> Wouxun_KG-935G | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 4-Jan-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
New Model Support- Wouxun KG-935G Plus Fixes: #10355 Add support for Wouxun KG-935G Plus
2023-02-07 16:15:40 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-935G_Plus"></a> Wouxun_KG-935G_Plus | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 7-Feb-2023 | Yes | |
Fixes and testing: wouxun.py, wouxun_common.py & update matrix
2022-12-11 14:44:24 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV6"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV6 | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.19% |
Convert Wouxun KG-UV8D for python3 This has not been tested with a real radio, but the cloning routines are straightforward and a simple test is added to exercise them to confirm they do the right thing.
2022-12-24 11:34:20 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV8D"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV8D | Unit tested; needs confirm | 24-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.24% |
Fix KG-UV8DPlus for python3 Only tested by unit tests. Related to #10208
2023-01-02 09:21:07 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV8D_Plus"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV8D_Plus | Unit tested; needs confirm | 2-Jan-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
Fix KG-UV8E for python3 Related to #10208
2023-01-02 10:03:27 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV8E"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV8E | W5EGL | 2-Jan-2022 | Yes | 0.05% |
Add Wouxun KG-UV8H support Fixes: #8803
2023-03-27 16:32:09 -04:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV8H"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV8H | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 27-Mar-2023 | Yes | 0.01% |
Convert KGUV920PA for py3
2022-12-19 08:05:04 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV920P-A"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV920P-A | [@KC9HI](https://github.com/KC9HI) | 22-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.04% |
New Model support Wouxun KG-UV980P, KG-1000G, KG-1000G Plus Fixes: #7223 Fixes: #10109 Fixes: #9979
2023-01-23 22:36:21 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV980P"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV980P | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 23-jan-2023 | Yes | 0.01% |
[kguv9dplus] convert to MemoryMapBytes
2023-01-10 17:21:35 -08:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV9D_Plus"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV9D_Plus | [@samwich](https://github.com/samwich) | 10-Jan-2023 | Yes | 0.39% |
Add Wouxun KG-UV9GX Fixes: #10457 Add support for Wouxun KG-UV9GX
2023-03-27 16:50:33 -04:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV9GX"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV9GX | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 27-Mar-2023 | Yes | |
Add Wouxun KG-UV9G Pro Fixes: #10535 Add Wouxun KG-UV9G Pro
2023-04-25 15:44:52 -04:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV9G_Pro"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV9G_Pro | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 25-Apr-2023 | Yes | |
Add Wouxun KG-UV9K (8.33k step) support Fixes: #6895 Add support for KG-UV9K with 8.33k step option
2023-04-14 20:54:53 -04:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV9K"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV9K | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 14-Apr-2023 | Yes | |
New Model Support for Wouxun KG-UV9PX Fixes: #10067 Add Support for Wouxun KG-UV9GX
2023-01-20 15:57:04 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UV9PX"></a> Wouxun_KG-UV9PX | [@mrtjr1](https://github.com/mrtjr1) | 20-Jan-2022 | Yes | |
Fixes and testing: wouxun.py, wouxun_common.py & update matrix
2022-12-11 14:44:24 -05:00
| <a name="Wouxun_KG-UVD1P"></a> Wouxun_KG-UVD1P | [Implied by Wouxun_KG-UV6](#user-content-Wouxun_KG-UV6) | 11-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.35% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-1500M"></a> Yaesu_FT-1500M | [@f3sty](https://github.com/f3sty) | 05-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-1802M"></a> Yaesu_FT-1802M | | | Yes | 0.02% |
Mark Yaesu FT3DR as tested and friends implied
2022-12-30 18:01:15 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-1D_R"></a> Yaesu_FT-1D_R | [Implied by Yaesu_FT3D_R](#user-content-Yaesu_FT3D_R) | 30-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Fix Yaesu FT-4 (and friends) for python3 This was largely designed to work on python3 natively, so no big surprise that it basically works. Fixed a couple logging issues and added a test to exercise the cloning routines enough to consider it unit tested.
2022-12-24 13:13:57 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-25R"></a> Yaesu_FT-25R | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-4XE](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-4XE) | 24-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
Update FT-2800 support status for next
2023-06-04 19:45:44 -07:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-2800M"></a> Yaesu_FT-2800M | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10616) | 05-Jun-2023 | Yes | 0.03% |
Convert Yaesu FT-2900 for python3 Fixes: #10274
2023-01-14 18:01:10 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900R"></a> Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900R | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10274) | 14-Jan-2023 | Yes | 0.05% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900RTXMod_Opened_Xmit"></a> Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900RTXMod_Opened_Xmit | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900R](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-2900R_1900R) | 14-Jan-2023 | Yes | |
Update FT-450 for python3 compatibility Fixes #10612
2023-05-31 15:40:36 -07:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-450D"></a> Yaesu_FT-450D | [@Old-Phart](https://github.com/Old-Phart) | 01-Jun-2023 | Yes | 0.01% |
Fix Yaesu FT-4 (and friends) for python3 This was largely designed to work on python3 natively, so no big surprise that it basically works. Fixed a couple logging issues and added a test to exercise the cloning routines enough to consider it unit tested.
2022-12-24 13:13:57 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-4VR"></a> Yaesu_FT-4VR | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-4XE](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-4XE) | 24-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-4XE"></a> Yaesu_FT-4XE | Unit tested; needs confirm | 24-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.14% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-4XR"></a> Yaesu_FT-4XR | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-4XE](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-4XE) | 24-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.11% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-50"></a> Yaesu_FT-50 | | | Yes | 0.04% |
Mark FT60 as actually tested by N0EYE Fixes #10252
2023-01-09 15:06:45 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-60"></a> Yaesu_FT-60 | N0EYE | 9-Jan-2023 | Yes | 0.49% |
Record Yaesu FT-65E as working Successfully tested download, modify memory and setting, upload, and verified changes on radio.
2023-01-27 15:34:40 +00:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-65E"></a> Yaesu_FT-65E | [@kwirk](https://github.com/kwirk) | 27-Jan-2023 | Yes | 0.08% |
Record IC-2300 and FT-65R as working Fixes #10264 Fixes #10266
2023-01-13 12:23:04 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-65R"></a> Yaesu_FT-65R | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10266) | 13-Jan-2022 | Yes | 0.18% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-70D"></a> Yaesu_FT-70D | [@n8sqt](https://github.com/n8sqt) | 05-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.27% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-7100M"></a> Yaesu_FT-7100M | | | Yes | 0.03% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-7800_7900"></a> Yaesu_FT-7800_7900 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.14% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-8100"></a> Yaesu_FT-8100 | | | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-817"></a> Yaesu_FT-817 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.04% |
Mark 817_ND as implied like the other variants
2022-12-12 16:42:22 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-817ND"></a> Yaesu_FT-817ND | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.07% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-817ND_US"></a> Yaesu_FT-817ND_US | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.02% |
Update py3_driver_testers.txt
2023-02-04 19:55:06 +00:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-818"></a> Yaesu_FT-818 | [@thomasrussellmurphy](https://github.com/thomasrussellmurphy) | 4-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.05% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-818ND_US"></a> Yaesu_FT-818ND_US | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-857_897"></a> Yaesu_FT-857_897 | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.25% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-857_897_US"></a> Yaesu_FT-857_897_US | [Implied by Yaesu_FT-817](#user-content-Yaesu_FT-817) | 14-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.08% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-8800"></a> Yaesu_FT-8800 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 24-Oct-2022 | Yes | 0.08% |
Mark three radios as tested in -next Icom T7H Yaesu FT-8900 TYT TH-9800 Fixes #10755 Fixes #10752 Fixes #10747
2023-07-30 10:39:49 -07:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-8900"></a> Yaesu_FT-8900 | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10753) | 30-Jul-2023 | Yes | 0.11% |
Fix Yaesu FT-90 for python3 This is not actually confirmed working yet, because the upload process seems to depend on the previous patch for opening the port early. However, the upload isn't raising python3 errors and the download works, so I'm calling this reported working for python3 issues until advised otherwise. Fixes #10386
2023-02-22 15:32:47 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT-90"></a> Yaesu_FT-90 | [Reported working](https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10386) | 22-Feb-2023 | Yes | 0.02% |
Mark Yaesu FT3DR as tested and friends implied
2022-12-30 18:01:15 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FT2D_R"></a> Yaesu_FT2D_R | [Implied by Yaesu_FT3D_R](#user-content-Yaesu_FT3D_R) | 30-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT2D_Rv2"></a> Yaesu_FT2D_Rv2 | [Implied by Yaesu_FT3D_R](#user-content-Yaesu_FT3D_R) | 30-Dec-2022 | Yes | |
| <a name="Yaesu_FT3D_R"></a> Yaesu_FT3D_R | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 30-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.03% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FTM-3200D_R"></a> Yaesu_FTM-3200D_R | | | Yes | 0.02% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FTM-350"></a> Yaesu_FTM-350 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 4-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fix "market share" stats for a few things First, I was imperfect in my matching of models with special characters (spaces, parens, slashes, etc) so those were not represented here. Second, I wasn't including aliases in the market share for the parent radio. This substantially alters the stats (in a good way for total completion).
2022-12-09 16:47:54 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_FTM-7250D_R"></a> Yaesu_FTM-7250D_R | | | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-170"></a> Yaesu_VX-170 | | | Yes | 0.03% |
Verify VX-2 Tested read/modify/write/verify for editing: memory frequencies/labels, settings (opening message text). System: macOS 10.14.6 and SparkFun DEV-14050 (CH340G) breakout
2023-01-21 03:17:43 +00:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-2"></a> Yaesu_VX-2 | [@thomasrussellmurphy](https://github.com/thomasrussellmurphy) | 20-Jan-2023 | Yes | 0.04% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-3"></a> Yaesu_VX-3 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.08% |
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-5"></a> Yaesu_VX-5 | [Probably works](https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/chirp/drivers/yaesu_clone.py) | 12-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.07% |
Update test matrix for Yaesu VX-6
2022-12-10 23:02:34 -05:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-6"></a> Yaesu_VX-6 | [@dominickpastore](https://github.com/dominickpastore) | 10-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.16% |
Add model usage stats to test matrix This adds some stats about which models are the most widely used to the test matrix to help guide decisions about total testing versus relevant testing. Model stats are captured from our own databases, and are far from perfect, but are probably sufficiently useful. Stats captured on 9-Dec-2022.
2022-12-09 08:43:59 -08:00
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-7"></a> Yaesu_VX-7 | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.09% |
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-8DR"></a> Yaesu_VX-8DR | [@kk7ds](https://github.com/kk7ds) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-8GE"></a> Yaesu_VX-8GE | [Implied by Yaesu_VX-8DR](#user-content-Yaesu_VX-8DR) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.01% |
| <a name="Yaesu_VX-8R"></a> Yaesu_VX-8R | [Implied by Yaesu_VX-8DR](#user-content-Yaesu_VX-8DR) | 15-Feb-2019 | Yes | 0.03% |
| <a name="Yedro_YC-M04VUS"></a> Yedro_YC-M04VUS | [Implied by Retevis_RT95](#user-content-Retevis_RT95) | 13-Nov-2022 | Yes | 0.02% |
Fixes and testing: retevis_rt22.py & update Python3 Driver Testing matrix
2022-12-08 21:39:10 -05:00
| <a name="Zastone_ZT-X6"></a> Zastone_ZT-X6 | [Implied by Retevis_RT22](#user-content-Retevis_RT22) | 9-Dec-2022 | Yes | 0.11% |
Add some stats to the testing report So we can see how much is completed vs. remaining.
2022-10-23 23:00:13 -07:00
## Stats
ga510.py: Add Abbree AR-F5 - fixes #9575
2023-08-09 18:28:31 -04:00
**Drivers:** 414
Add some stats to the testing report So we can see how much is completed vs. remaining.
2022-10-23 23:00:13 -07:00
ga510.py: Add Abbree AR-F5 - fixes #9575
2023-08-09 18:28:31 -04:00
**Tested:** 86% (359/55) (93% of usage stats)
Add some stats to the testing report So we can see how much is completed vs. remaining.
2022-10-23 23:00:13 -07:00
ga510.py: Add Abbree AR-F5 - fixes #9575
2023-08-09 18:28:31 -04:00
**Byte clean:** 90% (374/40)
Add a test procedure to the bottom of the matrix For consistency and so a reader knows what "tested" means.
2022-12-04 10:51:06 -08:00
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
## Meaning of this testing
The goal here is not necessarily to test the drivers themselves in terms of
actual functionality, but rather to validate the Python 3 conversion
work required of nearly all drivers. Thus, we are not trying to
comprehensively test these models so much as make sure they work at least
as well as they do on the Python 2 branch. Uncovering and reporting new
bugs is definitely welcome, but for the purpoes of this effort, "no worse
than the legacy branch" is good enough. There are multiple levels of
confirmation in the matrix above:
* Tested with real hardware (i.e. a person listed in the "Tester" column)
using roughly the procedure below.
* An "implied by (model)" link means that another model was tested, and it
is so similar, that the model on that line can be considered tested as
well.
* A "probably works" link means that the driver has not been tested with
real hardware, nor is it substantially similar to another model, but
shares a common base that entirely provides the cloning routines with
other drivers that have been tested with real hardware, such that
confidence is high that it will work. Only drivers with test images in
the tree (or live drivers) should be marked with this class.
Add a definition of 'unit tested' on the matrix
2022-12-27 10:03:22 -08:00
* A "unit tested" link means that the driver has not been tested with
real hardware, nor does it share common cloning routines with another
radio. However, synthetic simulation tests have been added to exercise
the parts of the cloning routines that are likely to fail under python3.
This is the lowest-confidence status and a real confirmation is needed.
Add a "probably works" status to the test matrix This is for drivers that share a cloning protocol module with other tested drivers *and* are tested on a static image in the tree. For example, all the kenwood live drivers use the same few routines for communicating with the radio. Icom clone-mode radios (with one exception) use the icf module for cloning and thus there's really nothing to convert in the drivers themselves.
2022-12-12 16:29:18 -08:00
If you have a model listed in this matrix with either "implied" or
"probably works" status, an actual confirmation with real hardware is
welcome and can replace the weaker reference.
Fix spelling Fixed with: codespell --skip=.git,.tox,locale,fips.py --ignore-words-list=ans,covert,damon,nam,parm,parms,rcall,ro,samwich,sav,ser,setts,synopsys,wth --summary --write-changes
2023-06-03 22:34:37 +02:00
## Minimal test procedure
Add a test procedure to the bottom of the matrix For consistency and so a reader knows what "tested" means.
2022-12-04 10:51:06 -08:00
For the purposes of the Python 3 effort, a "tested" radio means
at least the following procedure was followed:
1. Download from the radio
1. Make some change to a memory
1. If the radio has settings support, make sure settings load and tweak one setting
1. Upload to the radio
1. Confirm that the changes stick and look correct, or at least are not a
regression from the master py2 branch.
The drivers are all passing the automated tests, but tests with real hardware
and serial ports is important, especially around bytes-vs-string safety.
To update this document, add/edit entries in `tests/py3_driver_testers.txt` and
then run `tox -e makesupported`. Commit the result (including the changes to this `.md`
file) and submit a PR.
Add a note about "Byte Clean" to the matrix
2022-12-09 19:06:32 -08:00
The "Byte Clean" flag refers to whether or not the radio has set the
`NEEDS_COMPAT_SERIAL = False` flag on the radio class, and thus uses
`MemoryMapBytes` exclusively internally. Whenever possible, all radios
that are fixed for py3 should do so with this flag set to False and with
the byte-native memory map.
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink